Cent Eur J Public Health 2004, 12(4):184-186

Effectiveness of School Programs in Tobacco Control

Baška T.1, Straka Š.1, Bašková M.2, Maďar R.1
1 Institute of Epidemiology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University
2 Institute of Nursing, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Slovak Republic

The authors reviewed published data dealing with the effectiveness of school programs in tobacco control. Most of the evaluated school programs showed at least partial effect including namely improved knowledge level, decreased prevalence of smoking initiation and continuation. Less successful was achieving of behavioural changes and social resistance. Effect of the school programs can be significantly amplified by combination with other interventions such as mass media campaigns, parent involvement and extracurricular activities.
The main problem of the studies in this field is a relatively short follow-up time not allowing considering findings as relevant evidences for long-term effects of school programs. However, even assuming only time limited decrease of prevalence of smoking among intervened students, such temporary effect leads to the decrease of a lifetime cigarette exposure having beneficial health effects.
Considering social, demographic and cultural aspects of the epidemiology of smoking habit, evidence based data in this field, relevant for Central and Eastern Countries, are required. Such situation calls for authentic trials and studies respecting specific conditions in these countries.

Keywords: tobacco, school programs, prevention

Received: June 1, 2004; Revised: June 14, 2004; Accepted: June 14, 2004; Published: December 1, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Baška T, Straka Š, Bašková M, Maďar R. Effectiveness of School Programs in Tobacco Control. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2004;12(4):184-186. PubMed PMID: 15666454.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. The World Health Report 2002. Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2002, 248 p.
    2. WHO: Tobacco Free Initiative. November 2003, http://www.who.int/tobacco/en/.
    3. The Global Youth Tobacco Survey Collaborative Group. Tobacco use among youth: a cross country comparison. Tob Control, 2002;11(3):252270. Go to original source...
    4. Guidelines for School Health Programs to Prevent Tobacco Use and Addiction. MMWR, 1994; 43 (RR-2):19p. 186
    5. OVID. November 03, 2003, available at: http://gateway.ovid.com/.
    6. Adelman WP, Duggan AK, Hauptman P et al.: Effectiveness of a high school smoking cessation program. Pediatrics, 2001; 107 (4):E50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Ahmed NU, Ahmed NS, Bennett CR et al.: Impact of a Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E) program in preventing the initiation of cigarette smoking in fifth- and sixth-grade students. J Natl Med Assoc, 2002; 94(4): 249-56. Go to PubMed...
    8. Aveyard P, Cheng KK, Almond J et al.: Cluster randomised controlled trial of expert system based on the transtheoretical (stages of change) model for smoking prevention and cessation in schools. Br Med J, 1999; 319 (7215): 948-53. Go to original source...
    9. Botvin GJ, Griffin KW, Diaz T et al: Drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: posttest and one-year follow-up of a school-based preventive intervention. Prev Sci, 2001; 2(1): 1-13. Go to original source...
    10. Botvin GJ, Griffin KW, Diaz T et al: Smoking initiation and escalation in early adolescent girls: one-year follow-up of a school-based prevention intervention for minority youth. J Am Med Womens Assoc, 1999; 54(3): 139-43, 152. Go to PubMed...
    11. Brown KS, Cameron R, Madill C et al: Outcome evaluation of a high school smoking reduction intervention based on extracurricular activities. Prev Med, 2002; 35(5): 506-10. Go to original source...
    12. Cameron R, Brown KS, Best JAet al: Effectiveness of a social influences smoking prevention program as a function of provider type, training method, and school risk. Am J Publ Health, 1999; 89(12): 1827-31. Go to original source...
    13. Chen WW, Lindsey R: Evaluation of a tobacco prevention program on knowledge, attitudes, intention and behavior of tobacco use among fourth grade students-a preliminary study. J Drug Educ, 2001; 31(4): 399-410. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Eckhardt L, Woodruff SI, Elder JP: Related effectiveness of continued, lapsed, and delayed smoking prevention intervention in senior high school students. Am J Health Promot, 1997; 11(6): 418-21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Flynn BS, Worden JK, Secker-Walker RH et al: Long-term responses of higher and lower risk youths to smoking prevention interventions. Prev Med, 1997; 26(3): 389-94. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Heimann KJ:Aschool-based intervention program to prevent adolescent smoking. J Sch Nurs, 2000; 16(4): 22-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Josendal O, Aaro LE: BE smokeFREE - evaluation of an intervention program for smoke-free schools. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 2002; 122(4): 403-7 [in Norwegian]. Go to PubMed...
    18. Kealey KA, PetersonAV Jr, Gaul MAet al: Teacher training as a behavior change process: principles and results from a longitudinal study. Health Educ Behav, 2000; 27(1): 64-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Lee FH, Wang HH: Effects of health education on prevention of smoking among eighth-grade students. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2002; 18(6):295304.
    20. Lund KE, Luhr E, Josendal O: BE smokeFREE-from trials to national implementation. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 2002; 122(4): 408-14 [in Norwegian]. Go to PubMed...
    21. Noland MP, Kryscio RJ, Riggs RS et al: The effectiveness of a tobacco prevention program with adolescents living in a tobacco-producing region. Am J Publ Health, 1998; 88(12): 1862-5. Go to original source...
    22. Palmer RF, Graham JW, White EL et al: Applying multilevel analytic strategies in adolescent substance use prevention research. Prev Med, 1998; 27(3): 328-36. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Perry CL, Komro KA,Veblen-Mortenson S et al:Arandomized controlled trial of the middle and junior high school D.A.R.E. and D.A.R.E. Plus programs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 2003; 157(2): 178-84. Go to original source...
    24. Perry CL, Williams CL, Veblen-Mortenson S et al: Project Northland: outcomes of a communitywide alcohol use prevention program during early adolescence. Am J Publ Health, 1996; 86(7): 956-65. Go to original source...
    25. Price JH, Beach P, Everett S et al: Evaluation of a three-year urban elementary school tobacco prevention program. J Sch Health, 1998; 68(1): 26-31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. Reddy KS, Arora M, Perry CL et al: Tobacco and alcohol use outcomes of a school-based intervention in New Delhi. Am J Health Behav, 2002; 26(3): 173-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Svoen N, Schei E: Adolescent smoking prevention-primary health care in cooperation with local schools.Acontrolled intervention study. Scand J Prim Health Care, 1999; 17(1): 54-8. Go to original source...
    28. VanDyke EM, Riesenberg LA: Effectiveness of a school-based intervention at changing preadolescents' tobacco use and attitudes. J Sch Health, 2002; 72(6): 221-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Vartiainen E, Paavola M, McAlister A et al: Fifteen-year follow-up of smoking prevention effects in the North Karelia youth project.Am J Publ Health, 1998; 88(1): 81-5. Go to original source...
    30. Wiborg G, Hanewinkel R: Effectiveness of the "Smoke-Free Class Competition" in delaying the onset of smoking in adolescence. Prev Med. 2002; 35(3): 241-9. Go to original source...
    31. Burchfield J, Marenco A, Dickens D et al: An anti-smoking project instituted by senior nursing students in a rural community. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs, 2000; 23(3): 155-64. Go to original source...
    32. Persson LG: "Contract" prevents school youth from initiating tobacco use. Percentage of smoking/snuff-taking 13-16-year-olds cut in half over a six-year period. Lakartidningen, 2003; 100(4): 226-9 [in Swedish]. Go to PubMed...
    33. Wakefield MA, Chaloupka FJ. Kaufman NJ et al: Effect of restrictions on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: cross sectional study. Br Med J, 2000; 321(7257): 333-7. Go to original source...
    34. Stephens T, Kaiserman MJ, McCall DJ et al: School-based smoking prevention: economic costs versus benefits. Chronic Dis Can, 2000; 21(2): 62-7. Go to PubMed...
    35. Hrubá D, Zachovalová L, Fiala J, Kyasová M: Evaluation of the level of nicotine dependence among adolescent smokers. Cent Eur J Publ Health, 2003; 11(3): 163-8.
    36. Sovinová H, Csémy L: Smoking behaviour of Czech adolescents: results of the global youth tobacco survey in the Czech Republic, 2002. Cent Eur J Publ Health 2004; 12(1): 26-31.
    37. Geckova A, van Dijk JP, van Ittersum-Gritter T et al.: Determinants of adolescents' smoking behaviour: A literature review. Cent Eur J Publ Health 2002; 10 (3): 79-87.

    Return to the content