Cent Eur J Public Health 2006, 14(4):200-207 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a3383

The Case of the Silesian Regional Sickness Fund - Did "Social Capital" Determine the Success of Health Reform in the Silesian Voivodeship, Poland?

Krzysztof Krajewski-Siuda, Piotr Romaniuk, Krzysztof Kaczmarek
Department of Health Policy, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Silesia, Bytom, Poland

The paper is an effort to find what determined the success of Polish health reform implemented in 1999 in the Silesian Voivodeship. The problem has been referred to "social capital" proposed by R. Putnam; the first part of the article contains a short description of this approach. Then data concerning health insurance performance in Poland are presented, which confirm that the Silesian Regional Sickness Fund functioned most effectively. As a possible factor influencing present decentralised institutions performance, the situation of the Silesian Region during the mid-war period was described. Autonomy of the region, as well as tradition of social voluntary activity may be a source of "social capital" in Putnam's meaning. Besides, continuity of the Prussian bismarckian health insurance system is presented as a potential source of "institutional memory" also increasing the present reform's chances for success. In the last part of the paper, limitations of applying the "social capital" approach to the Silesian case are presented, such as shortness of the mid-war autonomy period and changes in the cultural structure of Upper Silesia caused by migrations after World War II. Other factors, which could increase the efficacy of the health insurance system, such as relatively high incomes of the region's inhabitants, are also described. Nevertheless, the final conclusion is that social and cultural conditions deriving from historical traditions could have had a significant influence on the process of implementing health reform in 1999.

Klíčová slova: social capital, health reform, Silesia, Poland

Revidováno: 7. červenec 2006; Přijato: 7. červenec 2006; Zveřejněno: 1. prosinec 2006  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Krajewski-Siuda K, Romaniuk P, Kaczmarek K. The Case of the Silesian Regional Sickness Fund - Did "Social Capital" Determine the Success of Health Reform in the Silesian Voivodeship, Poland? Cent Eur J Public Health. 2006;14(4):200-207. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3383. PubMed PMID: 17243501.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Fandrejewska-Tomczyk A. The reasons of the low level of public acceptation for the reform of social health insurance in 1999. In: Kolarska - Bobińska L, editor. Four reforms - from the concept to the realization. Warsaw: The Institute of Public Affairs; 2000. p. 197-206. (In Polish.)
  2. Stępień W. "Public opinion" about the health care. Zdrow Zarządzanie. 2003;5(5):41-4. (In Polish.)
  3. Health Care Systems in Transition. Poland. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Care Systems; 1999.
  4. The National Health Care. Strategic directions of activity of the Ministry of Health for years 2002-2003. Antidotum. 2002;11(3):61-76. (In Polish.)
  5. Kowalska - Koprowska I. Reform of the health care: programmes, laws and opinions of the decision makers. Zdrow Publiczne Zarządzanie. 2003;1(1):64-76. (In Polish.)
  6. Włodarczyk C. Health reforms: universal problem. Krakow: The Jagiellonian University Publishing; 2003. (In Polish.)
  7. Bossert T.Analyzing the decentralization of health systems in developing countries: decision space, innovation and performance. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(10):1513-27. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  8. The social health insurance in Poland 1999-2001. Warsaw: The Health Insurance Control Office; 2001. (In Polish.)
  9. Putnam R, Leonardi R, Nanetti R. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1993. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  10. ArsaetherN.Reflectionsonhealthanddemocracy.Michael.2004;1(3):22130.
  11. Popper KR. The open society and its enemies. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishing House; 1993. (In Polish.)
  12. Holecki T. The civic society as the endeavour to the ideal of polis. In: Goryńska - Bittner B, editor. The decline () of the civic society in Poland. Poznań: The August Cieszkowski University of Agriculture; 2005. p. 64-73. (In Polish.)
  13. The small statistical yearbook of Poland 2005. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office of Poland; 2006.
  14. The statistical bulletin of the Ministry of Health 2001. Warsaw: The Centre of Computer Systems in Health Care; 2002. (In Polish.)
  15. The statistical bulletin of the Ministry of Health 2002. Warsaw: The Centre of Computer Systems in Health Care; 2003. (In Polish.)
  16. Central Statistical Office [homepage on the Internet]. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office; c1995-2006 [cited 2006 Jun 12]. Available from: http://www.stat.gov.pl/english/.
  17. Sienkiewicz T. The Silesian fund already in Europe. Służba Zdrowia. 2002;(34-37). (In Polish.)
  18. Pieńkowską A. Silesian fund - the IT leader. Służba Zdrowia. 2002; (83-86). (In Polish.)
  19. CzubińskiA. The history of Poland 1864-2001. Wrocław: The Ossolinscy National Publishing; 2002. (In Polish.)
  20. Lis M. Upper Silesia. The outline of the history until the middle 20th century. Opole: Opole University; 2001. (In Polish.)
  21. Upper SilesianAssociation, editors. The Silesian autonomy. The Constitutional Law of 1920, July 15. Zabrze (PL): The Upper SilesianAssociation, Zabrze division, City Museum of Zabrze; 1991. (In Polish.)
  22. Frankowska L. The sickness insurance (sickness funds). Warsaw: The Workers Bookshop; 1929. (In Polish.)
  23. Górny J. The basic regulations on the health and accident insurance in the Republic of Poland before and after 1933. Zdrow Publiczne. 1980;(4):25763. (In Polish.)
  24. Kopeć E. We and them on the Polish Silesia 1922-1939. Katowice: The Silesia Publishing; 1986. (In Polish.)
  25. Bukowska - Floreńska I. The ethno-cultural crashes among the Silesian societies. In: Bazielich B, editor. The Silesia - ethno-cultural community and the diversity. Wrocław: Wroclaw University; 1995. p. 99-111. (In Polish.)
  26. Szczepański MS. Opel with the mining plume. The restructurisation of the Katowickie Voivodeship and the social conditions of this process. Katowice: The Silesia Scientific Publishing House; 1998. (In Polish.)
  27. Szczepański MS. Cultural borderland in sociological and political perspective (the case of Upper Silesia). In: Wódz J, editor. Local power and modern community political life. Sociological essays. Katowice: The Silesian University Publishing; 1999. (In Polish.)
  28. Swadźba U. The Silesia as a mulicultural society. Recently, today and tomorrow. In: Rokicki J, Banaś M, editors. Nation, culture and the state in the process of globalisation. Kraków: The Jagiellonian University Publishing; 2004. (In Polish.)
  29. Skowronek A. The Upper Silesia on its route to the European Union. In: Szczepański M, editor. What region? What Poland? What Europe? Katowice: The Silesian University Publishing; 2001. p. 161-76. (In Polish.)
  30. The National Electoral Commission website [homepage of the Internet]. Warsaw: The National Electoral Commission; [cited 2006 Jun 12]. Available from: http://referendum.pkw.gov.pl/sww/kraj/indexA.html
  31. Szpor G. The employment in the heavy industry in years 1950-55. Studia i Materiały z dziejów Śląska. 1983;13:443-5.
  32. Statistical yearbook of the regions - Poland 2001. Warsaw: The Central Statistical Office of Poland; 2001. Received Jannuary 18, 2006