Cent Eur J Public Health 2010, 18(1):43-53 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a3557

Determinants of Regional Differences in Sick Leave Duration for Homogeneous Groups in the Netherlands: Their Implications for Social Security Policy-Making

Willibrord Beemsterboer1, Roy Stewart2, Johan Groothoff2, Frans Nijhuis1
1 Department of Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, University of Maastricht, the Netherlands
2 Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands

Objectives: Regional differences in sick leave duration determinants were studied between in age and profession homogeneous groups in different regions in the Netherlands, i.e. Utrecht and Southern Limburg, in order to find any effects of socio-cultural factors.

Material and methods: 137 participants in Utrecht and Southern Limburg were interviewed. Data of sick leave duration were obtained from the social fund.

Results: A statistical comparison of sick leave duration figures showed that, in Southern Limburg, determinants of 'health status' (questions about perceived health and burnout due to work) and 'individual characteristics and circumstances' (age, gender and satisfaction with private circumstances) were associated with sick leave duration and, in Utrecht, the 'work contents' determinant autonomy.

Conclusions: In the regions studied, different determinants appeared to be associated with sick leave duration and for some of them the European integration was assumed to have a lasting effect. Nationwide policy interventions to reduce sick leave duration should take into account the existence of regional differences in determinants predicting sick leave duration and the potential effects of different socio-cultural characteristics on laying claim to social security.

Keywords: regions, sick leave duration, determinants, social security policy

Received: March 15, 2009; Revised: November 10, 2009; Accepted: November 10, 2009; Published: March 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Beemsterboer W, Stewart R, Groothoff J, Nijhuis F. Determinants of Regional Differences in Sick Leave Duration for Homogeneous Groups in the Netherlands: Their Implications for Social Security Policy-Making. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2010;18(1):43-53. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3557. PubMed PMID: 20586230.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Beemsterboer W, Stewart R, Groothoff J, Nijhuis, F. On regional differences in duration of sick leave: the role of work, individual and health characteristics. Arch Public Health. 2005;63(6):293-312.
    2. LFS.The European Labour Force Survey. Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities; 2003.
    3. Prins R. Sickness absence in Belgium, Germany (FR), and the Netherlands: a comparative study. Maastricht: University of Maastricht; 1990.
    4. Halusa G, Oppen M, Buerckhardt D, Schneider M. Regional conditions and sickness absence in Berlin. Berlin: Bundesministerium fuer Forschung und Technologie; 1982. (In German.)
    5. Picard J, Mills A. The effect of malaria on work time: analysis of data from two Nepali districts. J Trop Med Hyg. 1992 Dec;95(6):382-9.
    6. Vrijhof B, Prins R. Absenteeism in the Netherlands: the most important figures. In: Smulders PGW, Veerman TJ, editors. Absenteeism manual. Guide for business practice. The Hague: Delwel; 1993. p. 33-54. (In Dutch.)
    7. Szubert Z, Zycinska Z. Analysis of work absenteeism due to illness in the provinces. Med Pr. 1996;47(2):117-23. (In Polish.) Go to PubMed...
    8. Feeney A, North F, Head J, Canner R, Marmot M. Socioeconomic and sex differentials in reason for sickness absence from the Whitehall II Study. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Feb;55(2):91-8. Go to original source...
    9. Virtanen P, Nakari R,Ahonen H, Vahtera J, Pentti J. Locality and habitus: the origins of sickness absence practices. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jan;50(1):2739. Go to original source...
    10. Moncrieff J, Pomerleau J. Trends in sickness benefits in Great Britain and the contribution of mental disorders. J Public Health Med. 2000 Mar;22(1):59-67. Go to original source...
    11. Virtanen P, Vahtera J, Nakari R, Pentti J, Kivimaki M. Economy and job contract as contexts of sickness absence practices: revisiting locality and habitus. Soc Sci Med. 2004 Apr;58(7):1219-29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Tordoir W, Van der Klaauw, Van Maanen-Boekestein. Public health and long duration of sick leave. Leiden: NIPG/TNO; 1978. (In Dutch.)
    13. Soeters J. Absenteeism in the reconstructed area of Southern Limburg. Maastricht: University of Maastricht; 1980. (In Dutch.)
    14. Detam. Figures on sick leave (districts). Utrecht: Detam; 1991.
    15. Statistics Netherlands. National registration of absenteeism. The Hague: Statistics Netherlands (CBS); 2006. (In Dutch.)
    16. Stevens F, Van der Zee J. Health care in national and Euregional perspective. In: Soeters J, Spoormans H, Welten R. Renewed Limburg. Reconstruction and development. Schiedam: Scriptum; 1990. (In Dutch.)
    17. Bloemberg B, Doornbos G, Van Oostrum M. Regional health profiles. Bilthoven: National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM); 1993. (In Dutch.)
    18. Statistics Netherlands. Permanent Study of Life Conditions. The Hague: Statistics Netherlands (CBS); 1993. (In Dutch.)
    19. Municipal Health Services Limburg. Mortality in Limburg: trend report 1985-1999. Limburg: Municipal Health Services Limburg; 2005. (In Dutch.)
    20. Statistics Netherlands. Health characteristics and medical consumption after Municipal Health Services. The Hague: Statistics Netherlands (CBS); 2006. (In Dutch.)
    21. Hofstee E. Growth of the Dutch population. In: den HollanderAN.Temper and course. Half a century of social change in the Netherlands. Assen: Van Gorcum; 1962. p. 13-85. (In Dutch.)
    22. Hofstede G. Culture's consequences, international differences in workrelated values. London: Sage; 1980.
    23. Van Deursen C, Smulders P, Bongers, P. Does poor health predict absenteeism? Tijdschr Soc Gezondheidsw. 1997;75(4):157-64. (In Dutch.)
    24. Boot CR, van der Gulden JW, Orbon KH, Vercoulen JH, Akkermans R, van Weel C, et al. Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: differences between workers with and without sick leave. IntArch Occup Environ Health. 2004 Jun;77(5):357-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. De Groot M. Quantitative approach of absenteeism of Dutch factory workers with neurosis. Leiden: NIPG/TNO; 1958. (In Dutch.)
    26. Philipsen H. Absence due to illness. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff; 1969. (In Dutch.)
    27. Veerman T. Theoretical models on absenteeism. In: Smulders PGW, Veerman TJ, editors. Absenteeism manual. Guide for company practice. The Hague: Delwel; 1993. (In Dutch.)
    28. Nijhuis F, Soeters J. Work and illness: a study of absenteeism due to illness and incapacity for work in 51 companies in Southern Limburg. Maastricht: University of Maastricht; 1982. (In Dutch.)
    29. Smulders P. Balance of 30 years of research on sickness absence: results of 318 studies summarized. Leiden: NIPG/TNO; 1984. (In Dutch.)
    30. Grosfeld J. The predictability of individual sick leave duration. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger; 1988. (In Dutch.)
    31. Klein Hesselink D, Kruidenier H, Veerman T, Buijs P. Absenteeism explained. A literature search on determinants of sick leave and incapacity for work. Amsterdam: NIA; 1993. (In Dutch.)
    32. Dutch National Atlas of Public Health [Internet]. Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM); 2004 [cited 2009 Mar 15]. Available from: http://www.rivm.nl/vtv/object_document/o6990n22311.html.
    33. Bisscheroux P, Nijhuis J, Kruijnen M, Knipschild P, Limonard C. Health Vademecum Limburg. Maastricht: MEMIC; 1986. (In Dutch.)
    34. National Public Health Compass. Bilthoven: RIVM; 2006. (In Dutch.)
    35. Institute for Employee Insurances. Social insurance atlas 2003-2005. Amsterdam: UWV; 2005. (In Dutch.)
    36. De Winter CR. Work, health and absenteeism as predictors of disability pension. Maastricht: University of Maastricht; 1991. (In Dutch.)
    37. Cortina J. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993 Feb;78(1):98-104. Go to original source...
    38. Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International; 1999.
    39. Soeters J, Felling,A. Limburg's own. In: Soeters J, Spoormans H, Welten R. Renewed Limburg. Reconstruction and development. Schiedam: Scriptum; 1990. (In Dutch.)
    40. Philipsen H. Health and health care in Belgium. Some snags in the supposedly green grass of a system comparison. Gezondheid Samenleving. 1985;6:228. (In Dutch.)
    41. Limburg in figures. Maastricht: Province of Limburg, Department for Strategy and Innovation; 2006. (In Dutch.)
    42. Dans easy: data-archiving system [Internet].The Hague:The Netherlands; 1995 [cited 2009 Mar 15]. FellingA, Peters J, Schreuder, O. Socio-cultural developments in the Netherlands]. SOCON 1985. P1012.Available from: http://easy.dans.knaw.nl/dms?command=show&didAction=&query=veranderingen&sortColumn=&windowStyle=default. (In Dutch.)
    43. Dans easy: data-archiving system [Internet]. The Hague: The Netherlands; 2000 [cited 2009 Mar 15]. Eisinga R, Coenders, M. Socio-cultural developments in the Netherlands. SOCON 2000. P1556.Available from: http://easy.dans.knaw.nl/dms?command=show&didAction=&query=veranderingen&sortColumn=&windowStyle=default. (In Dutch.)
    44. Knibbe K. Faith in the familiar: continuity and change in religious practices and moral orientations in the South of Limburg, the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit; 2007.
    45. Karasek R. Lower health risk with increased job control among white collar workers. J Organ Behav. 1990;11:171-85. Go to original source...
    46. Greiner BA, Krause N, Ragland DR, Fisher JM. Objective stress factors, accidents, and absenteeism in transit operators: a theoretical framework and empirical evidence. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Apr;3(2):130 Go to original source...
    47. Shain M. The role of the workplace in the production and containment of health costs: the case of stress-related disorders. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 1999;12(2-3): i-vii. Go to original source...
    48. Ala-Mursula L, Vahtera J, Kivimäki M, Kevin MV, Pentti, J. Employee control over working times: associations with subjective health and sickness absences. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Apr;56(4):272-8. Go to original source...
    49. Soeters J, Spoormans H, Welten R. Limburg, now and further. In: Soeters J, Spoormans H, Welten R. Renewed Limburg. Reconstruction and development. Schiedam: Scriptum; 1990. (In Dutch.)
    50. Chadwick-Jones J, Nicholson N, Brown C. Social psychology of absenteeism. New York: Praeger; 1982.
    51. Nicholson N, Johns G.The absence culture and the psychological contract: who's in control of absence? Acad Manage Rev. 1985;10(3):397-407. Go to original source...
    52. Van Deursen C, Reuling A, Veerman T. SZW-Forum of Employers 1998-1999, absenteeism, work circumstances, reintegration, incapacity to work. The Hague: Ministry of SocialAffairs and Employment/Elsevier Bedrijfsinformatie; 2000. (In Dutch.)
    53. Plantenga J. The choice of significance level in policy-making socioscientific research. Sociologische Gids. 1981;28. (In Dutch.)

    Return to the content