Cent Eur J Public Health 2012, 20(1):18-23 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a3722
What Limits the Effectiveness of School-based Anti-smoking Programmes?
- 1 Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 2 Faculty of Education, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
Backround: It is generally accepted that living in families where there are smokers, children are stressed not only by the harmful physical exposure to second-hand and third-hand tobacco smoke, but also by the negative models of the adult relatives' behaviour, as relatives who smoke can inspire children to imitate this behaviour, influencing attitudes towards, and early experiments with smoking. In this paper, some of the most important results about influence of family smoking on the effects of the anti-smoking educational programme "Non-smoking Is Normal" are described.
Methods: The school-based programme was created by medical and educational specialists and targets children at the first level of primary schools (aged from 6 to 11 years). The data about interesting outcomes of the programme (knowledge, attitudes, behaviour) were collected by anonymous questionnaire, administered twice in each school year: one month before the complex of 5 lectures (pre-tests) and 4-5 months after the last lecture (post-tests). The sample of participants (860-910) was divided into four groups, according to the intervention and family backrounds: (1) programme children from smoking families "P-S"; (2) control children from smoking families "C-S"; (3) programme children from non-smoking families "P-NS"; (4) control children from non-smoking families "C-NS". The differences in the frequency of children's answers were analysed using the tests in statistic Epi Info software, version 6.04a (chi-square, Mantel Haenszel, Yates, Fisher).
Results: In the programme group, the number of children with smoking relatives was significantly higher than in the control group (80.1% vs. 73.0%, p<0.01) as well as of those who reported frequent/daily exposure to secondhand smoke at homes and/or in cars (49.5% vs. 40.0%, p<0.01). Smoking families significantly influenced the children's seeking of smoking friends (40% vs. 17%, p<0.01). The programme has significantly increased the amount of knowledge about health risks of smoking. Both in the programme and control groups of children from non-smoking families, the frequency of critics of adults smoking was significantly higher all the time of the study (p<0.05 and 0.01 resp.); however, the programme influenced children's opinions about smoking (criticism) only partially. Children's actual intentions about their smoking in the future was fully influenced by their smoking household environment: the number of "future no-smokers" has decreased in time and was significantly less frequent among children from smoking families (p<0.01). The frequency of those willing to smoke significantly increased within the period between 3rd and 5th grades, both in the programme and the control groups (p<0.01). An almost linear increase of active experimentations with cigarette smoking in follow-up monitoring was seen, trends of smoking children were steeper in groups from smoking families. The number of experiments with smoking was significantly lower in programme children of non-smoking parents only at the end of the study (p<0.05).
Conclusions: Despite of the effort to initiate parental participation on the primary prevention of smoking, we have confirmed that smoking in families decreased the efficacy of anti-smoking intervention targeted on young children at school age.
Keywords: educational programme "Non-smoking Is Normal", effects, knowledge, attitudes, opinions, behaviour, schoolchildren 6-11 years
Received: October 19, 2011; Revised: January 17, 2012; Accepted: January 17, 2012; Published: March 1, 2012 Show citation
References
- US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the surgeon general [Internet].Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006 [cited 2011 Sep 19]. Available from: http://www.surgeongeneral.com/library/secondhandsmoke/report.
- Winickoff JP, Friebely J, Tanski SE, Sherrod C, Matt GE, Hovell MF, et al. Beliefs about the health effects of "thirdhand" smoke and home smoking bans. Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):e74-9.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Cardano M, Costa G, Demaria M. Social mobility and health in the Turin longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med. 2004 Apr;58(8):1563-74.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Siegrist J, Marmot M. Health inequalities and the psychosocial environment - two scientific challenges. Soc Sci Med. 2004 Apr;58(8):1463-73.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Muller T. Breaking the cycle of children's exposure to tobacco smoke. London: British Medical Association; 2007.
- Swan AV, Creeser R, Murray M. When and why children first start to smoke. Int J Epidemiol. 1990 Jun;19(2):323-30.
Go to original source...
- Conrad KM, Flay BR, Hill D. Why children start smoking cigarettes: predictors of onset. Br J Addict. 1992 Dec;87(12):1711-24.
Go to original source...
- Bricker JB, Peterson AV, Robyn Andersen M, Leroux BG, Bharat Rajan K, Sarason IG. Close friends', parents', and older siblings' smoking: reevaluating their influence on children's smoking. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Apr;8(2):217-26.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Rainio SU, Rimpelä AH, Luukkaala TH, Rimpelä MK. Evolution of the association between parental and child smoking in Finland between 1977 and 2005. Prev Med. 2008 Jun;46(6):565-71.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Ritchie D, Amos A, Phillips R, Cunningham-Burley S, Martin C. Action to achieve smoke-free homes: an exploration of experts' views. BMC Public Health. 2009 Apr 22;9:112.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Thomson G, Wilson N, Howden-Chapman P. Population level policy options for increasing the prevalence of smokefree homes. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Apr;60(4):298-304.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Glynn TJ. Essential elements of school-based smoking prevention programs. J Sch Health. 1989 May;59(5):181-8.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- World Health Organization. Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
- McKinlay J, Marceau L. US public health and the 21st century: diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 2000 Aug 26;356(9231):757-61.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992 Sep;47(9):1102-14.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Song AV, Glantz SA, Halpern-Felsher BL. Perceptions of second-hand smoke risks predict future adolescent smoking initiation. J Adolesc Health. 2009 Dec;45(6):618-25.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- de Vries H. ABC's of health education and health promotion. 6th ed. Maastricht: University of Maastricht; 2008.
- Mayhew KP, Flay BR, Mott JA. Stages in the development of adolescent smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000 May 1;59 Suppl 1:S61-81.
Go to original source...
- Darling H, Reeder A. Is exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke in the home related to daily smoking among youth? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2003 Dec;27(6):655-6.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- de Vries H, Engels R, Kremers S, Wetzels J, Mudde A. Parents' and friends' smoking status as predictors of smoking onset: findings from six European countries. Health Educ Res. 2003 Oct;18(5):627-36.
Go to original source...
- SchultzAS, Nowatzki J, Dunn DA, Griffith EJ. Effects of socialization in the household on youth susceptibility to smoking: a secondary analysis of the 2004/05 Canadian Youth Smoking Survey. Chronic Dis Can. 2010 Jun;30(3):71-7.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Glover M, Scragg R, Min S, Kira A, Nosa V, McCool J, et al. Driving kids to smoke? Children's reported exposure to smoke in cars and early smoking initiation. Addict Behav. 2011 Nov;36(11):1027-31.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Conley Thomson C, Siegel M, Winickoff J, Biener L, Rigotti NA. Household smoking bans and adolescents'perceived prevalence of smoking and social acceptability of smoking. Prev Med. 2005 Aug;41(2):349-56.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- AlbersAB, Biener L, Siegel M, Cheng DM, Rigotti N. Household smoking bans and adolescent antismoking attitudes and smoking initiation: findings from a longitudinal study of a Massachusetts youth cohort. Am J Public Health. 2008 Oct;98(10):1886-93.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Seo DC, Bodde AE, Torabi MR. Salient environmental and perceptual correlates of current and established smoking for 2 representative cohorts of Indiana adolescents. J Sch Health. 2009 Mar;79(3):98-107.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: lung cancer and other disorders. Washington, DC: US EPA; 1992.
- Jarvie JA, Malone RE. Children's secondhand smoke exposure in private homes and cars: an ethical analysis. Am J Public Health. 2008 Dec;98(12):2140-5.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Wakefield MA, Chaloupka FJ, Kaufman NJ, Orleans CT, Barker DC, Ruel EE. Effect of restrictions on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2000Aug 5;321(7257):333-7. Erratum in: BMJ. 2000 Sep 9;31(7261):623.
Go to original source...
- Freeman B, Chapman S, Storey P. Banning smoking in cars carrying children: an analytical history of a public health advocacy campaign. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008 Feb;32(1):60-5.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Thomson G, Weerasekera D, Wilson N. New Zealand smokers'attitudes to smokefree cars containing preschool children: very high support across all sociodemographic groups. N Z Med J. 2009 Aug 7;122(1300):84-6.