Cent Eur J Public Health 2012, 20(4):297-298 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a3792

Avicenna's Doctrine and Institutional Review Board in International Bio-Medical Research

Amir Radfar1, Chekameh Kazerouninia2, Irina Filip3, Diana Patriche4, Seyed Ahmad Asgharzadeh Ahmadi5
1 University of Massachusetts, Lowell, USA
2 University of Phoenix, Arizona, USA
3 University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA
4 University of Medicine Alexandru Ioan Cuza, Bucharest, Romania
5 Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

Avicenna, an outstanding Persian physician and philosopher (980 AD-1037 AD), established a clinical treaty, or doctrine, without which medical experimentation would not have progressed. This doctrine emphasizes the ultimate divine power of God or a higher being over healing and mandates the patients' well-being as the crucial aspect in all medical care and experiments. The Institutional Review Board, as the ethical body that oversees clinical research, is in line with this doctrine. However, the lack of a homogenous and internationally recognized code of ethics, the decentralized work of ethics oversight committees, the improper implementation of established ethical standards and a shortage of scientific auditing capacities have raised concerns over the possible exploitation of vulnerable populations.

Keywords: Avicenna, bioethics, IRB, Belmont report, vulnerable population, international research

Received: May 15, 2012; Revised: November 8, 2012; Accepted: November 8, 2012; Published: December 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Radfar A, Kazerouninia C, Filip I, Patriche D, Asgharzadeh Ahmadi SA. Avicenna's Doctrine and Institutional Review Board in International Bio-Medical Research. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2012;20(4):297-298. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3792. PubMed PMID: 23441398.
Download citation

References

  1. Colgan R. Advice to the young physician: on the art of medicine. New York: Springer Verlag; 2009. Go to original source...
  2. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The Belmont Report. Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research [Internet]. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research; 1979 [cited 2012 Oct 08]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html.
  3. Fischer C, Oneto C. Kaplan medical USMLE medical ethics: the 100 cases you are most likely to see on the exam. New York: Kaplan Publishing; 2006.
  4. Coleman CH, Bouësseau MC. How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review. BMC Med Ethics. 2008 Mar 28;9:6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Eckenwiler L. Moral reasoning and the review of research involving human subjects. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2001 Mar;11(1):37-69. Go to original source...
  6. London L. Ethical oversight of public health research: can rules and IRBs make a difference in developing countries? Am J Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1079-84. Go to original source...