Cent Eur J Public Health 2013, 21(2):109-117 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a3791

The Perception of Patients' Rights among Belgian Population

Dirk Devroey1, Michel Deneyer2, Ellen Scheys1, Erwin Van De Vijver1, Lieve Van den Block1
1 Department of Family Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
2 Department of Pediatrics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

The aim of this study was to explore the knowledge and perception of specific patients' rights and the problems experienced with their fulfilment among the Belgian population. Participants were recruited through patient association groups and health insurance companies. They completed an Internet-based questionnaire with 20 questions concerning patients' rights. In total, 309 persons completed all questions. The mean age of participants was 46 years (SD=15), 58% of them were women. Participants judged patients' rights concerning the end of life (88%), affordable health care (87%) and information about health status (85%) as the most important issues. Participants particularly showed concern about their legal rights for care offered in the patients' own language (21%), euthanasia (15%) and affordable health care (14%). The most important problems experienced so far were related to care offered in the patients' own language (12%), affordable health care (11%) and access to their medical file (7%).

Keywords: patients' rights, legislation, jurisprudence, delivery of health care, end-of-life care, right to consent, right of privacy

Received: May 13, 2012; Revised: April 2, 2013; Accepted: April 2, 2013; Published: June 1, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Devroey D, Deneyer M, Scheys E, Van De Vijver E, Van den Block L. The Perception of Patients' Rights among Belgian Population. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2013;21(2):109-117. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3791. PubMed PMID: 24053068.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Vision of the patient to significant developments in health. The law on the rights of the patient - the patient as an expert. Sint-Truiden: Ziekeren Psychiatric Center, 2004. (In Dutch.)
    2. Dijkhoffz HW. Annual report of the Dutch-speaking federal mediator for the rights of the patient. Brussels: Federal Public Service for Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment; 2004. (In Dutch.)
    3. Gryson S, Verhaegen MN, Wilmotte R, Debreyne V.Annual report of the Dutch-speaking federal mediator for the rights of the patient. Brussels: Federal Public Service for Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment; 2008. (In Dutch.)
    4. Deneyer M, De Groot E, Decreton S, Verheijen P, Van den Brande P, Broos P. Deontological aspects of medicine, more specifically for the surgeon in a changing social environment. Acta Chir Belg. 2009 NovDec;109(6):670-3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Gryson S, Verhaegen MN, Wilmotte R, Debreyne V.Annual report of the Dutch-speaking federal mediator for the rights of the patient. Brussels: Federal Public Service for Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment; 2006. (In Dutch.)
    6. Gryson S, Verhaegen MN, Wilmotte R, Debreyne V.Annual report of the Dutch-speaking federal mediator for the rights of the patient. Brussels: Federal Public Service for Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment; 2007. (In Dutch.)
    7. Claudot F, Alla F, Villemot JP, Aliot E, Coudane H, Juillière Y. Analysis of patient claims related to care in a university cardiology department over the period 2003-2007. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 NovDec;103(11-12):595-602. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Survey of patient rights. Brussels: Socialist Mutual; 2008. (In Dutch.)
    9. Statistics Belgium [Internet]. Brussels: Belgian Federal Government; 2011. Structure of the Belgian population in 2010; [cited 2011 Mar 1]. Available from: http://statbel.fgov.be/nl/statistieken/cijfers/bevolking/structuur/index.jsp. (In Dutch.)
    10. Tates K, Zwaanswijk M, Otten R, van Dulmen S, Hoogerbrugge PM, Kamps WA, et al. Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hardto-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Mar 3;9:15. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Krishna L. Consent in terminal sedation. Indian J Med Ethics. 2010 JulSep;7(3):161-4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Van den Block L, Deschepper R, Bossuyt N, Drieskens K, Bauwens S,Van Casteren V, et al. Care for patients in the last months of life: the Belgian Sentinel Network Monitoring End-of-Life Care study. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 8;168(16):1747-54. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Ryan CJ, Callaghan S. Legal and ethical aspects of refusing medical treatment after a suicide attempt: the Wooltorton case in the Australian context. Med J Aust. 2010 Aug 16;193(4):239-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Schwartz K, Claxton G. The patient protection and affordable care act: how will it affect private health insurance for cancer patients? Cancer J. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):572-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Schoonacker M, Louckx F.The law on patients' rights: knowledge, use and attitudes among professionals (doctors, specialists and nurses). Haverlee: Flemish Patients' Platform; 2006. (In Dutch.)
    16. Schoonacker M, Louckx F. The law on patients' rights: communication with the patient.Astudy among general practitioners in Flanders. Haverlee: Flemish Patients' Platform; 2007. (In Dutch.)
    17. Van den Block L, Deschepper R, Bilsen J, Bossuyt N, Van Casteren V, Deliens L. Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions: a mortality followback study in Belgium. BMC Public Health. 2009 Mar 9;9:79. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Cady RF. A review of basic patient rights in psychiatric care. JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul. 2010 Oct-Dec;12(4):117-25. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Kuzu N, Ergin A, Zencir M. Patients' awareness of their rights in a developing country. Public Health. 2006 Apr;120(4):290-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Erer S, Atici E, Erdemir AD. The views of cancer patients on patient rights in the context of information and autonomy. J Med Ethics. 2008 May;34(5):384-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Pérez-Cárceles MD, Lorenzo MD, Luna A, Osuna E. Elderly patients also have rights. J Med Ethics. 2007 Dec;33(12):712-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Yousuf RM, FauziAR, How SH,Akter SF, ShahA. Hospitalised patients' awareness of their rights: a cross-sectional survey from a tertiary care hospital on the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Singapore Med J. 2009 May;50(5):494-9. Go to PubMed...
    23. FraserA. Preventing abuse of older people. Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2010 Oct;17(6):26-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    24. Pope TM. Legal briefing: organ donation and allocation. J Clin Ethics. 2010 Fall;21(3):243-63. Go to PubMed...
    25. Boukus ER, Grossman JM, O'Malley AS. Physicians slow to e-mail routinely with patients. Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2010 Oct;(134):1-5.
    26. Hader AL, Brown ED. Patient privacy and social media. AANA J. 2010 Aug;78(4):270-4. Go to PubMed...
    27. Deneyer M, Clybouw C, De Groot E, De Backer A, Van den Brande P, Vandenplas Y. The Surgeon and the Law on Patient's Rights for Minors. Acta Chir Belg. 2011 May-Jun;111(3):119-24. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    28. McAbee GN. Committee on Medical Liability and Risk Management American Academy of Pediatrics. Consent by proxy for nonurgent pediatric care. Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;126(5):1022-31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. VandeCreek L. Defining and advocating for spiritual care in the hospital. J Pastoral Care Counsel. 2010 Summer;64(2):5.1-10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Rosenbaum S. Data governance and stewardship: designing data stewardship entities and advancing data access. Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct;45(5 Pt 2):1442-55. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. O'Keefe CM, Connolly CJ. Privacy and the use of health data for research. Med J Aust. 2010 Nov 1;193(9):537-41. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    32. Lane J, Schur C. Balancing access to health data and privacy: a review of the issues and approaches for the future. Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct;45(5 Pt 2):1456-67. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    33. France FR. eHealth in Belgium, a new "secure" federal network: role of patients, health professions and social security services. Int J Med Inform. 2011 Feb;80(2):e12-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    34. FerreiraA, Correia R, Chadwick D,Antunes L.Access control in healthcare: the methodology from legislation to practice. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 1):666-70. Go to PubMed...

    Return to the content