Cent Eur J Public Health 2013, 21(3):128-133 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a3781
What Can Public Endorsement for a Smoking Ban Policy Really Mean? Preliminary Findings from a Qualitative Study
- 1 Department of Epidemiology, Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
- 2 Faculty of Social Science, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Objectives: The aim of the study is to describe attitudes which underlie Pole's declarations of support for a smoking ban in public places.
Methods: The qualitative study using semi-structured individual in-depth interviews was conducted. The 30 IDI-s (in depth interviews) being a part of a larger research project entitled 'Lay meanings of health and life orientation of Polish society versus prevention and health promotion attitudes' were realized between 2007-2009. People belonging to all key socio-demographic categories identified by variables such as sex, age, education, and place of domicile were interviewed. The resulting material was subjected to content analysis. In the study the structural concept of 'attitude' was adopted. In order to identify the attitudes towards smoking bans in public places statements related to all three components of attitudes were analysed, but the typology of attitudes was constructed mainly on the basis of the emotional-evaluative component.
Results: The study identified as many as four attitudes behind the declared support for a smoking ban in public places. Those attitudes were labelled 'supportive', 'accepting', 'conditionally accepting', and 'ambivalent'. They differ as regards degree of acceptance for the ban, conviction about harmfulness of passive smoking, setting great store by other regulators of smoking like cultural norms or healthy consciousness, and propensity to observe and execute the smoking ban. The 'supportive' attitude can be characterized not only by total support for the smoking ban in public places but also by insistence on the need for its extension. The 'accepting' attitude means approval for the smoking ban, and the 'conditionally accepting' attitude is distinguished from the others by the stress put on the right of smokers to have an access to places where smoking is permitted. The 'ambivalent' attitude can be typified by underlining other than legal ways of influencing smoking in public places.
Conclusions: The study suggests that the attitudes underlying the Pole's declarations of support for a smoking ban in public places can be differentiated. However, because of the low number of participants in the study the results should be verified thus the further research is needed. Therefore, there is a need not only to study people's declaration of support or objection for the smoking ban in public places but also to examine their attitudes including cognitive and behavioural components using both qualitative and quantitative methods of social research.
Keywords: smoking ban in public places, attitudes, public health, passive smoking, Poland
Received: April 20, 2012; Revised: May 16, 2013; Accepted: May 16, 2013; Published: September 1, 2013 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Zatoński W, Przewoźniak K, editors. Tobacco smoking in Poland: attitudes, health consequences and prevention. Warsawa: Centrum Onkologii - Instytut im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie; 1996. (In Polish.)
- Taylor R, Najafi F, Dobson A. Meta-analysis of studies of passive smoking and lung cancer: effects of study type and continent. Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;36(5):1048-59.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Smokefree Policies. Evaluating the effectiveness of smoke-free policies. IARC Handbooks of cancer prevention, tobacco control, v. 13 [Internet]. Lyon: IARC; 2009 [cited 2010 Aug 23]. Available from: http://www.iarc.fr/en/publications/pdfs-online/prev/handbook13/handbook13.pdf.
- Act on the Protection of Public Health Against the Effects of Tobacco Use of 9 November 1995. Dziennik Ustaw Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. 1996;(10):157-9. (In Polish.)
- Ordinance of the Minister of Labour and Social Policy of 26 September 1997 on general principles of work safety and hygiene. Dziennik Ustaw Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. 2003;(169):11615-55. (In Polish.)
- Amendment to the Act on the Protection of Public Health Against the Effects of Tobacco Use of 28 November 2003. Dziennik Ustaw Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. 2003;(229):16086-9. (In Polish.)
- Amendment to the Act on the Protection of Public Health Against the Effects of Tobacco Use and the Act on the State Sanitary Inspection of 8 April 2010. Dziennik Ustaw Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. 2010;(81)6847-8. (In Polish.)
- Jones S, Muller T. Public attitudes to smoke free polices in Europe. In: Lifting the smokescreen: 10 reasons for smoke free Europe [Internet]. Brussels: European Respiratory Society; 2006 [cited 2010 Apr 30]. Available from: http://dev.ersnet.org/uploads/Document/46/WEB_CHEMIN_1554_1173100608.pdf
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006.
- Schumann A, John U, Thyrian JR, Ulbricht S, Hapke U, Meyer C. Attitudes towards smoking policies and tobacco control measures in relation to smoking status and smoking behaviour. Eur J Public Health. 2006 Oct;16(5):513-9.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- CBOS. Attitudes towards cigarette smoking. Research Report. Warsaw: CBOS; 2008. (In Polish.)
- Russell K, Granville S. Smoking in public places: a consultation on reducing exposure to second hand smoke. Key findings from focus group research [Internet]. Edinburgh: The Scottish Executive; 2004 [cited 2010 Aug 23]. Available from: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/12/20381/48227.
- Marody M. Attitude. In: Encyclopaedia of Sociology. Vol. 3. Warsaw: Oficyna Naukowa; 2000. (In Polish.)
- Lelong N, Kaminski M, Chwalow J, Bean K, Subtil D. Attitudes and behavior of pregnant women and health professionals towards alcohol and tobacco consumption. Patient Educ Couns. 1995 Feb;25(1):39-49.
Go to original source...
- Nowak S. The notion of attitude in theories and applied social research. In: Nowak S, editor. Theories of attitudes. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe; 1973. (In Polish.)
- OppenheimAN. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Continuum; 1992.
- Poland BD, Cohen JE, Ashley MJ, Adlaf E, Ferrence R, Pederson LL, et al. Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. Tob Control. 2000 Dec;9(4):364-71.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kojder A. The prestige of law. Thirty years after. Pol Sociol Rev. 1996; (116):353-64.
- Kurczewski J. Either rightly or like a crook: legal culture of Polish society after communism. Studia Socjologiczne. 2007;185(2):33-60. (In Polish.)
- Beers DJ. Mass attitudes toward the law in postcommunist Europe: normative support vs. institutional trust [Internet]. Washington: American Political ScienceAssociation; 2006 [cited 2011 Mar 13].Available from: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p151258_index.html.
- Sekuła P. Political culture and consolidation of democracy. Kraków: Krakowskie Towarzystwo Edukacyjne - Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM; 2009. (In Polish.)