Cent Eur J Public Health 2015, 23(1):32-38

Growth of Czech Breastfed Infants in Comparison with the World Health Organization Standards

Jana Vignerová1, Lenka Shriver2, Markéta Paulová1, Marek Brabec3,4, Dagmar Schneidrová5, Renata Růžková6, Bohuslav Procházka7, Jitka Riedlová8
1 Department of Children and Adolescents, National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, USA
3 Institute of Computer Science, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
4 Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic
5 Department of Child and Youth Health, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
6 Practical Paediatrician, Prague, Czech Republic
7 Practical Paediatrician, Kutná Hora, Czech Republic
8 Department of Anatomy, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Growth references are important for paediatric health monitoring. It is critical to understand differences in growth interpretation and potential consequences when using available growth references. This study compares the growth of Czech breastfed children with the current WHO growth standards 2006 and the Czech references 1991, 2001. A total of 960 infant/parent pairs in the Czech Republic were recruited through paediatric practices. Anthropometric data were collected during infants' first 12 months of life and parent questionnaires were gathered during a preventive visit at 18 months. Czech breastfed infants were longer with a greater head circumference at all percentiles compared to the WHO standards and were similar to the national references. The percentile weight-for-age and weight-for-length values of infants (≤6 months) were lower, and higher (6-12 months) compared to the WHO standards. The infant growth in the sample differed from both the WHO standards as well as the national references. Our findings indicate that the growth of Czech breastfed children differs from the current national references. These discrepancies were smaller compared to the WHO standards. The results of the study were used for new growth assessment guidelines to optimize feeding recommendations for Czech infants. The adoption of the WHO standards in the Czech Republic is not recommended.

Klíčová slova: breastfeeding, Czech, growth standards, infants, national references, WHO standards

Vloženo: 25. listopad 2014; Revidováno: 12. leden 2015; Přijato: 12. leden 2015; Zveřejněno: 1. březen 2015  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vignerová J, Shriver L, Paulová M, Brabec M, Schneidrová D, Růžková R, et al.. Growth of Czech Breastfed Infants in Comparison with the World Health Organization Standards. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2015;23(1):32-38. PubMed PMID: 26036096.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. World Health Organization, Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards: length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age: methods and development [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2006 [cited 2014 Sep 24]. Available from: http://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/technical_report/en/.
  2. de Onis M, Garza C, Victora CG, OnyangoAW, Frongillo EA, Martines J. The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study: planning, study design, and methodology. Food Nutr Bull. 2004 Mar;25(1 Suppl):S15-26. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  3. de Onis M, OnyangoA, Borghi E, SiyamA, Blössner M, Lutter C; WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Worldwide implementation of the WHO Child Growth Standards. Public Health Nutr. 2012 Sep;15(9):1603-10. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  4. Roelants M, Hauspie R, Hoppenbrouwers K. Breastfeeding, growth and growth standards: performance of theWHO growth standards for monitoring growth of Belgian children.Ann Hum Biol. 2010 Jan-Feb;37(1):2-9. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  5. Prokopec M. Forty years of monitoring child growth in the Czech Republic: methodologies, outcomes and comparisons. In: Eiben OG, editor. Auxology '94. Children and youth at the end of the 20th Century: Invited and selected papers from the 7th International Congress of Auxology; 1994 Jun; Szombathely, Hungary. Budapest: ITC Plantin; 1994. p. 231-70.
  6. Lhotská L, Bláha P, Vignerová J, Roth Z, Prokopec M. 5th nation-wide anthropological survey of children and adolescents 1991 (Czech Republic): anthropometric characteristics. Prague: National Institute of Public Health; 1993.
  7. Bláha P, Vignerová J, Riedlová J, Kobzová J, Krejčovský L. 6th all-state anthropology investigation of children and youth 2001. Cesk Slov Pediatr. 2003;58(12):766-70. (In Czech.)
  8. Kobzová J, Vignerová J, Bláha P, Krejčovský L, Riedlová J. The 6th nationwide anthropological survey of children and adolescents in the Czech Republic in 2001. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2004 Sep;12(3):126-30.
  9. Matiegka J. Somatology of schoolchildren. Prague: Nakladatelství české akademie věd a umění; 1927. (In Czech.)
  10. Vignerová J, Riedlová J, Bláha P, Kobzová J, Krejčovský L, Brabec M, et al. 6th nation-wide anthropological survey of children and adolescents 2001, Czech Republic: summary results. Prague: Faculty of Science and National Institute of Public Health; 2006.
  11. Paulová M, Vignerová J, Lhotská L, Hrušková M. The Risk of accepting new standard of the World Health Organization for evaluating growth of the Czech child population (0-5 years of age). Cesk Slov Pediatr. 2008;63(9):465-72. (In Czech.)
  12. Activity in branch of out-patient care for children and adolescents in 2012. Aktuální informace ÚZIS ČR. 2013;(26):1-10. (In Czech.)
  13. Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2005 Jun;54(3):507-54. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  14. Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. Using the Box-Cox distribution in GAMLSS to model skewness and kurtosis. Stat Modelling. 2006;6(3):209-29. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  15. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards: growth velocity based on weight, length and head circumference: methods and development [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2009 [cited 2014 Sep 24].Available from: http://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/velocity/technical_report/en/.
  16. World Health Organization. WHO Anthro [Internet]. Version 3.2.2. Geneva: WHO; 2011 [cited 2014 Sep 24]. Available from: http://www.who.int/childgrowth/software/en/.
  17. National Institute of Public Health. RustCZ [Internet]. Version 2.3. Prague: National Institute of Public Health; 2011 [cited 2014 Sep 24]. Available from: http://www.szu.cz/publikace/data/program-rustcz-kestazeni?lang=1.
  18. de Onis M, Garza C, Onyango AW, Borghi E. Comparison of the WHO child growth standards and the CDC 2000 growth charts. J Nutr. 2007 Jan;137(1):144-8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  19. Grummer-Strawn LM, Reinold C, Krebs NF; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of World Health Organization and CDC growth charts for children aged 0-59 months in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010 Sep 10;59(RR-9):1-15.
  20. Maalouf-Manasseh Z, Metallinos-Katsaras E, Dewey KG. Obesity in preschool children is more prevalent and identified at a younger age when WHO growth charts are used compared with CDC charts. J Nutr. 2011 Jun;141(6):1154-8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  21. Monasta L, Lobstein T, Cole TJ, Vignerová J, Cattaneo A. Defining overweight and obesity in pre-school children: IOTF reference or WHO standard? Obes Rev. 2011 Apr;12(4):295-300. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  22. Schwarz NG, Grobusch MP, Decker ML, Goesch J, Poetschke M, Oyakhirome S, et al. WHO 2006 child growth standards: implications for the prevalence of stunting and underweight-for-age in a birth cohort of Gabonese children in comparison to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 growth charts and the National Center for Health Statistics 1978 growth references. Public Health Nutr. 2008 Jul;11(7):714-9. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  23. Willows ND, Sanou D, Bell RC. Assessment of Canadian Cree infants' birth size using the WHO Child Growth Standards.Am J Hum Biol. 2011 Jan-Feb;23(1):126-31. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  24. Wright C, Lakshman R, Emmett P, Ong KK. Implications of adopting the WHO 2006 Child Growth Standard in the UK: two prospective cohort studies. Arch Dis Child. 2008 Jul;93(7):566-9. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  25. Joint SACN/RCPCH Expert Group on Growth Standards. Application of WHO Growth Standards in the UK [Internet]. London: TSO; 2007 [cited 2014 Sep 24]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sacn-application-of-who-growth-standards-in-the-uk.
  26. Wright CM, WilliamsAF, Elliman D, Bedford H, Birks E, Butler G, et al. Using the new UK-WHO growth charts. BMJ. 2010 Mar 15;340:c1140. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  27. National Health and Medical Research Council, Department of Health and Ageing. Eat for health: Australian dietary guidelines: providing the scientific evidence for healthierAustralian diets [Internet]. Canberra: NHMRC; 2013 [cited 2014 Sep 24].Available from: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/n55_australian_dietary_guidelines_130530.pdf.
  28. Hughes I, Harris M, Cotterill A, Garnett S, Bannink E, Pennell C, et al. Comparison of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and World Health Organization references/standards for height in contemporary Australian children: analyses of the Raine Study andAustralian National Children's Nutrition and Physical Activity cohorts. J Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Nov;50(11):895-901. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  29. Júlíusson PB, Roelants M, Hoppenbrouwers K, Hauspie R, Bjerknes R. Growth of Belgian and Norwegian children compared to the WHO growth standards: prevalence below -2 and above +2 SD and the effect of breastfeeding. Arch Dis Child. 2011 Oct;96(10):916-21. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  30. Rolland-Cachera MF, Péneau S. Assessment of growth: variations according to references and growth parameters used. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Dec;94(6 Suppl):1794S-1798S. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  31. Vignerová J, Paulová M, Shriver LH, Riedlová J, Schneidrová D, Kudlová E, et al. The prevalence of wasting in Czech infants: a comparison of the WHO child growth standards and the Czech growth references. Matern Child Nutr. 2012 Apr;8(2):249-58. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  32. Paulová M, Riedlová J, Vignerová J, Schneiderová D. How to assess growth of breastfed infants in the first months of life [Internet]. Prague: National Institute of Public Health; 2011 [cited 2014 Sep 24]. Available from: http://www.szu.cz/uploads/documents/obi/CAV/LETAK.pdf. (In Czech.)