Cent Eur J Public Health 2016, 24(1):39-44

Estimation of Problem Drug Users in Prague in 2011 from Low-threshold Data: Modified Capture-Recapture Method, Adjusted for Clients Avoiding Any Identification (Non-Coded Clients)

Bruno Sopko1,2, Kateřina Škařupová3, Vlastimil Nečas1,5, Viktor Mravčík1,4,5
1 National Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Department of Medical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
3 Institute for Research on Children, Youth and the Family, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
4 Department of Addictology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
5 National Institute of Mental Health, Prague, Czech Republic

Aim: Local prevalence estimates of problem drug use (PDU) are crucial in the process of assessment of drug situation and trends and for the planning of evidence-based policy responses. The aims of our study are twofold: to estimate the number of problem drug users (PDUs) in the Czech capital city in 2011, and to examine the usability of the capture-recapture method (CRM) modified for data from low-threshold programmes (LTPs) for drug users.

Method: Six independent LTPs provided data for analysis (SANANIM, Drop-in and Progressive, each of these providing one drop-in centre and one outreach programme). After adjustment of the standard CRM formula for cases without an individual identifier, the overlaps between programmes were calculated and the size of hidden population was estimated.

Results: In total, it was estimated that there were 10,754 PDUs in Prague in 2011. The current estimate is in line with estimates obtained previously using another indirect standard approach - the multiplier method.

Conclusion: The modified version of CRM thus proved a reliable method for local PDU estimates.

Keywords: drug use, low-threshold programmes, population, capture-recapture, estimate

Received: September 9, 2014; Revised: December 21, 2015; Accepted: December 21, 2015; Published: March 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Sopko B, Škařupová K, Nečas V, Mravčík V. Estimation of Problem Drug Users in Prague in 2011 from Low-threshold Data: Modified Capture-Recapture Method, Adjusted for Clients Avoiding Any Identification (Non-Coded Clients). Cent Eur J Public Health. 2016;24(1):39-44. PubMed PMID: 27070968.
Download citation

References

  1. Degenhardt L, Hall W. Extent of illicit drug use and dependence, and their contribution to the global burden of disease. Lancet. 2012 Jan 7;379(9810):55-70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Thanki D, Vicente J. PDU (Problem drug use) revision summary. Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction; 2013.
  3. Kraus L, Augustin R, Frischer M, Kümmler P, Uhl A, Wiessing L. Estimating prevalence of problem drug use at national level in countries of the European Union and Norway. Addiction. 2003 Apr;98(4):471-85. Go to original source...
  4. Rehm J, Room R, van den Brink W, Kraus L. Problematic drug use and drug use disorders in EU countries and Norway: an overview of the epidemiology. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005 Aug;15(4):389-97. Continued from the previous page Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Mravčík V, Grohmannová K, Chomynová P, Nečas V, Grolmusová L, Kiššová L, et al. Annual report: The Czech Republic - 2011 drug situation. Prague: Office of the Government of the Czech Republic; 2012.
  6. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and DrugAddiction.An overview of the problem drug use (PDU) key indicator. Lisbon: EMCDDA; 2009.
  7. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Methodological guidelines to estimate the prevalence of problem drug use on the local level. Lisbon: EMCDDA; 1999.
  8. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Key epidemiological indicator: prevalence of problem drug use. Lisbon: EMCDDA; 2004.
  9. Mravcik V, Buresova Z, Popov P, Miovsky M. Sobering-up stations in the Czech Republic in the context of analogous models of care for acute intoxications in Europe. Cas Lek Ces. 2013;152(3):129-34. (In Czech.)
  10. Otis DL, Burnham KP, White GC, Anderson DR. Statistical-inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monogr. 1978;(62):7-135.
  11. Wittes J, Sidel VW. A generalization of the simple capture-recapture model with applications to epidemiological research. J Chronic Dis. 1968 Aug;21(5):287-301. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Estimating the size of a closed population. discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice. In: Bishop Y, Fienberg S, Holland P. Discrete multivariate analysis theory and practice. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 229-56.
  13. Tilling K, Sterne JA. Capture-recapture models including covariate effects. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Feb 15;149(4):392-400. Go to original source...
  14. Baillargeon S, Rivest L. Rcapture: loglinear models for capture-recapture in R. J Stat Softw. 2007 Apr;19(5):31. Go to original source...
  15. Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013 [cited 2016 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/.