Cent Eur J Public Health 2016, 24(3):234-240

Adverse Phototoxic Effect of Essential Plant Oils on NIH 3T3 Cell Line after UV Light Exposure

Svatopluk Binder1, Adéla Hanáková1, Kateřina Tománková1, Klára Pížová1, Robert Bajgar1, Barbora Manišová1, Kristina Kejlová2, Hana Bendová2, Dagmar Jírová2, Hana Kolářová1
1 Department of Medical Biophysics, Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
2 National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic

Aim: Natural or artificial substances have become an inseparable part of our lives. It is questionable whether adequate testing has been performed in order to ensure these substances do not pose a serious health risk. The principal aim of our research was to clarify the potential risk of adding essential oils to food, beverages and cosmetic products.

Methods: The toxicity of substances frequently employed in cosmetics, aromatherapy and food industry (bergamot oil, Litsea cubeba oil, orange oil, citral) were investigated using cell line NIH3T3 (mouse fibroblasts) with/without UV irradiation. The MTT assay was used to estimate the cell viability. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) which are products of a number of natural cellular processes such as oxygen metabolism and inflammation were measured to determine the extent of cellular stress. DNA damage caused by strand breaks was examined by comet assay.

Results: MTT test determined EC50 values for all tested substances, varying from 0.0023% v/v for bergamot oil to 0.018% v/v for citral. ROS production measurement showed that UV radiation induces oxidative stress to the cell resulting in higher ROS production compared to the control and non-irradiated samples. Comet assay revealed that both groups (UV, without UV) exert irreversible DNA damage resulting in cell death.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that even low concentrations (lower than 0.0464% v/v) of orange oil can be considered as phototoxic (PIF value 8.2) while bergamot oil is probably phototoxic (PIF value 4.6). We also found significant changes in the cell viability, ROS production and DNA after the cells were exposed to tested chemicals. Even though these substances are widely used as antioxidants it should be noted that they present a risk factor and their use in cosmetic and food products should be minimized.

Keywords: essential oils, UV light, NIH3T3 cell line, MTT test, reactive oxygen species, DNA damage

Received: March 22, 2015; Revised: August 23, 2016; Accepted: August 23, 2016; Published: September 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Binder S, Hanáková A, Tománková K, Pížová K, Bajgar R, Manišová B, et al.. Adverse Phototoxic Effect of Essential Plant Oils on NIH 3T3 Cell Line after UV Light Exposure. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2016;24(3):234-240. PubMed PMID: 27755863.
Download citation

References

  1. Tisserand R, Balacs T. Essential Oil Safety. A guide for health care professionals. Edinburgh (UK): Churchill Livingstone; 1995.
  2. Luo M, Jiang LK, Zou GL. Acute and genetic toxicity of essential oil extractedfromLitseacubeba(Lour.)Pers.JFoodProt.2005Mar;68(3):581-8. Go to original source...
  3. Bauer K, Garbe D, Surburg H. Common fragrence and flavor materials. 4th ed. Weinheim (Germany): Wiley; 2001. Go to original source...
  4. Verzera A, Trozzi A, Dugo G, Di Bella G, Cotroneo A. Biological lemon and sweet orange essential oil composition. Flavour Fragr J. 2004;19(6):544-8. Go to original source...
  5. Flamm WG, Lehman-McKeeman LD. The human relevance of the renal tumor-inducing potential of d-limonene in male rats: implications for risk assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1991 Feb;13(1):70-86. Go to original source...
  6. Lis-Balchin M.Aromatherapy science: a guide for healthcare professionals. London (UK): Pharmaceutical Press; 2006.
  7. Sobolev AS, Jans DA, Rosenkranz AA. Targeted intracellular delivery of photosensitizers. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2000;73(1):51-90. Go to original source...
  8. Placzek M, Frömel W, Eberlein B, Gilbertz KP, Przybilla B. Evaluation of phototoxicpropertiesoffragrances.ActaDermVenereol.2007;87(4):312-6. Go to original source...
  9. Lelièvre D, Justine P, Christiaens F, Bonaventure N, Coutet J, Marrot L, et al. The EpiSkin phototoxicity assay (EPA): development of an in vitro tiered strategy using 17 reference chemicals to predict phototoxic potency. Toxicol In Vitro. 2007 Sep;21(6):977-95. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Tice RR, Agurell E, Anderson D, Burlinson B, Hartmann A, Kobayashi H, et al. Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2000;35(3):206-21. Go to original source...
  11. Heaton PR, Ransley R, Charlton CJ, Mann SJ, Stevenson J, Smith BH, et al. Application of single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay for assessing levels of DNA damage in canine and feline leukocytes. J Nutr. 2002 Jun;132(6 Suppl 2):1598S-603S. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Binder S, Kolarova H, Tomankova K, Bajgar R, Daskova A, Mosinger J. Phototoxic effect of TPPS4 and MgTPPS4 on DNA fragmentation of HeLa cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2011 Sep;25(6):1169-72. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Tomankova K, Kejlova K, Binder S, DaskovaA, Zapletalova J, Bendova H, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity and phototoxicity study of cosmetics colorants. Toxicol In Vitro. 2011 Sep;25(6):1242-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Commission Directive 2000/33/EC of 25 April 2000 adapting to technical progress for the 27th time Council Directive 67/548 EEC on the approximation of laws,regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Off J Eur Communities. 2000 Jun 8;43(L136):90-107.
  15. Test no. 432: In Vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test. OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section 4 Health effects [Internet]. Paris: OECD; 2004 [cited 2016 Aug 28]. Available from: http://www.oecdilibrary.org/environment/test-no-432-in-vitro-3t3-nru-phototoxicitytest_9789264071162-en.
  16. Holzhütter HG.Ageneral measure of in vitro phototoxicity derived from pairs of dose response-curves and its use for predicting in vivo phototoxicity of chemicals. Altern Lab Anim. 1997;25:445-62. Go to original source...
  17. Collins AR. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Mol Biotechnol. 2004 Mar;26(3):249-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Fairbairn DW, Olive PL, O'Neill KL. The comet assay: a comprehensive review. Mutat Res. 1995 Feb;339(1):37-59. Go to original source...
  19. Valdez LB, Zaobornyj T, Boveris A. Mitochondrial metabolic states and membrane potential modulate mtNOS activity. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Mar;1757(3):166-72. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Liang CP, Wang M, Simon JE, Ho CT. Antioxidant activity of plant extracts on the inhibition of citral off-odor formation. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2004 Sep;48(4):308-17. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Rabbani SI, Devi K, Khanam S, Zahra N. Citral, a component of lemongrass oil inhibits the clastogenic effect of nickel chloride in mouse micronucleus test system. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2006 Apr;19(2):108-13.
  22. Pernice R, Borriello G, Ferracane R, Borrelli RC, Cennamo F, RitieniA. Bergamot: a source of natural antioxidants for functionalized fruit juices. Food Chem. 2009;112(3):545-50. Go to original source...
  23. Hwang JK, Choi EM, Lee JH. Antioxidant activity of Litsea cubeba. Fitoterapia. 2005 Dec;76(7-8):684-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Saeio K, Chaiyana W, Okonogi S. Antityrosinase and antioxidant activities of essential oils of edible Thai plants. Drug Discov Ther. 2011 Jun;5(3):144-9. Go to original source...
  25. dos Santos Montagner GF, Sagrillo M, Machado MM, Almeida RC, Mostardeiro CP, Duarte MM, et al. Toxicological effects of ultraviolet radiation on lymphocyte cells with different manganese superoxide dismutase Ala16Val polymorphism genotypes. Toxicol In Vitro. 2010 Aug;24(5):1410-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. de With A, Leitz G, Greulich KO. UV-B-laser-induced DNA damage in lymphocytes observed by single-cell gel electrophoresis. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1994 Jun;24(1):47-53. Go to original source...
  27. Ferlazzo N, Visalli G, Smeriglio A, Cirmi S, Lombardo GE, Campiglia P, et al. Flavonoid fraction of orange and bergamot juices protect human lung epithelial cells from hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:957031. doi: 10.1155/2015/957031. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Averbeck D, Averbeck S, Dubertret L, Young AR, Morlière P. Genotoxicity of bergapten and bergamot oil in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1990 Nov;7(2-4):209-29. Go to original source...
  29. Chouchi D, Barth D, Reverchon E, Della Porta G. Supercritical CO2 desorption of bergamot peel oil. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1995;34(12):4508-13. Go to original source...
  30. Berliocchi L, Ciociaro A, Russo R, Cassiano MG, Blandini F, Rotiroti D, et al. Toxic profile of bergamot essential oil on survival and proliferation of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011 Nov;49(11):2780-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. Off J Eur Union. 2009 Dec 22;52(L 342):59-209.
  32. IFRA. Standards [Internet]. Geneva: IFRA[cited 2016Aug 28].Available from: http://www.ifraorg.org/.