Cent Eur J Public Health 2018, 26(1):71-74 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a5150

Ensuring supplies of medicines during pandemics in terms of public procurement

Vít Vlček
Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture, Brno, Czech Republic

Objectives: This article describes and comments on contemporary legal regulations concerning the supply of medicines during pandemics in terms of public procurement.

Methods: Suggestions are made for removing existing legislative shortcomings, clarifying the diction of existing laws or rendering precision to legal regulation of public procurement given purchases of medicines during periods of imminent threats of pandemics and duration of pandemics.

Results: The author reflects on improving legislation concerning the lack of clarity and the doubts concerning the contemporary legal order of the Czech Republic, with reference to speeding up and simplifying public procurement procedures for incident-free purchases of necessary medicines in time of pandemic crisis situation and then effectively supporting the struggle against any pandemic infection.

Conclusion: The issues raised should be addressed since better legislation can significantly contribute to the containment of pandemics and their consequences for individual and public health.

Klíčová slova: public procurement, medicines, legal causes of systemic shortcomings, negotiated procedure without prior publication, pandemic

Vloženo: 14. červen 2017; Revidováno: 21. březen 2018; Zveřejněno: 30. březen 2018  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vlček V. Ensuring supplies of medicines during pandemics in terms of public procurement. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2018;26(1):71-74. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a5150. PubMed PMID: 29684302.
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Svoboda P, Ondřejek P, Šustek P, et al. Philosophical and legal theoretical aspects of human rights. Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Law; 2013. (In Czech.)
    2. Kosař D, Molek P, Honusková V, Jurman M, Lupačová H. Asylum act: commentary. Prague: Wolters Kluwer Czech Republic; 2010. (In Czech.)
    3. Gerloch A. Theory of law. Dobrá Voda: Aleš Čeněk Publishing; 2000. (In Czech.)
    4. Kruták T, Krutáková L, Gerych J. The Act on public procurement with commentary on October 1 2016. Olomouc: ANAG; 2016. (In Czech.)
    5. Krýsa I, Krýsová Z. The Act on protection of public health: commentary. Prague: Wolters Kluwer Czech Republic; 2016. (In Czech.)
    6. Král J. Pharmaceutical law. Prague: Erudikum; 2014. (In Czech.)
    7. Šustek P, Holčapek T, et al. Health law. Prague: Wolters Kluwer Czech Republic; 2016. (In Czech.)
    8. Bureš J, Drápal L, Krčmář Z, et al. Code of civil procedure: commentary. Prague: C. H. Beck; 2006. (In Czech.)
    9. Jemelka L, Pondělíčková K, Bohadlo D. Code of administrative procedure: commentary. 2nd ed. Prague: C. H. Beck; 2009. (In Czech.)
    10. Vedral J. Code of administrative procedure: commentary. 2nd ed. Prague: BOVA POLYGON; 2012. (In Czech.)
    11. Jemelka L, Vetešník P, Libosvár O. Control act: commentary. Prague: C. H. Beck; 2014. (In Czech.)
    12. Tuček M, et al. Hygiene and epidemiology. Prague: Karolinum; 2012. (In Czech.)
    13. Pomahač R, Handrlica J. EU administrative law. Prague: C. H. Beck; 2012. (In Czech.)
    14. Recommended actions before, during and after a pandemic. In: Pandemic influenza preparedness and response: a WHO guidance document. Geneva: WHO; 2009. p. 28-48.
    15. Knobler SL, Mack A, Mahmoud A, Lemon SM. The Threat of pandemic influenza. Are we ready? Workshop summary. Washigton (DC): National Academies Press; 2005.
    16. Rothstein MA. Should health care providers get treatment priority in an influenza pandemic? J Law Med Ethics. 2010;38(2):412-9. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    17. National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza. Washigton (DC): Homeland Security Council; 2005.
    18. Pandemic Influenza Plan: 2017 update. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2017.
    19. Eliáš K, et al. New civil code with updated explanatory report and index. Ostrava: Sagit; 2012. (In Czech.)

    Zpět na obsah