Cent Eur J Public Health 2020, 28(1):40-43 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a5965

Exposure to mercury from dental amalgam: actual contribution for risk assessment

Milan Tuček1, Milena Bušová1, Mája Čejchanová2, Anna Schlenker1, Martin Kapitán3
1 Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
2 National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic
3 Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University and University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

Objective: Mercury dental amalgam restorations are an important source of chronic exposure to mercury in the whole population and special attention should be paid not only to occupational exposure to mercury during the preparation and administration of amalgam. The authors' report is an up-to-date contribution to the health risk assessment of mercury use in dentistry, namely occupational exposure to mercury in dentists working with dental amalgam and exposure to mercury in persons treated with amalgam dental restorations.

Methods: Determination of total mercury in samples of biological material (urine, hair) was performed during 2017 and 2018 in 50 persons by the AAS method using the mercury vapour generation technique at 254.6 nm.

Results: Current dental exposures based on the most recent findings do not exceed acceptable risk levels and are below the biological limit of mercury in urine valid for occupationally exposed persons (100 μg.g-1 of creatinine), namely median value was 1.48 (min. < limit of detection (LOD), max. 17.14) μg.g-1 of creatinine (40 persons), total mercury content in hair of dental personnel expressed as median value was 0.340 (min. 0.060, max.1.628) μg.g-1. In controls (10 persons) was total mercury content in urine expressed as median value 0.36 (min. < LOD, max. 2.74) μg.g-1 of creatinine, in hair was median value 0.224 (min. 0.059, max. 0.453) μg.g-1.

Conclusions: Authors support opinion that amalgam fillings in the oral cavity are a permanent source of mercury for the body itself.

Keywords: dental amalgam, mercury, exposure, biological monitoring, health risks

Received: September 22, 2019; Revised: December 8, 2019; Accepted: December 8, 2019; Published: March 30, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Tuček M, Bušová M, Čejchanová M, Schlenker A, Kapitán M. Exposure to mercury from dental amalgam: actual contribution for risk assessment. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2020;28(1):40-43. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a5965. PubMed PMID: 32228815.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. World Health Organization. Inorganic mercury. Environ Health Criteria. 1991;(118):1-168.
    2. World Alliance for Mercury-Free Dentistry; European Environmental Bureau; European Center for Environmental Medicine. Developing national plans to phase down dental amalgam use in the EU member states [Internet]. EEB; 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 8]. Available from: https://eeb.org/publications/60/mercury/98494/report-developing-national-plans-to-phase-downt-dental-amalgam-in-the-eu.pdf.
    3. Krýsl S, Tuček M. Health risk assessment of mercury use in dentistry. Final report on results of study supported by grant no. IZ3523-3 (Internal Grant Agency of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic). Prague: Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic; 1998. (In Czech.)
    4. Tuček M. Present health risks of exposure to mercury and its compounds. Ces Prac Lek. 2006;7(1):26-37. (In Czech.)
    5. Tuček M, Bencko V, Krýsl S. Health hazard of dental amalgams. Chem Listy. 2007;101(12):1038-44. (In Czech.)
    6. Regulation (EU) 2017/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on mercury, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1102/2008. Off J Eur Union. 2017 May 24;60(L 137):1-21.
    7. Szadkowski D, Jörgensen A, Essing HG, Schaller KH. Creatinine elimination rate as reference value for analysis of urine samples. I. Effect of daily urine volume and circadian rhythm on creatinine excretion. Z Klin Chem Klin Biochem. 1970 Sep;8(5):529-33. (In German.) Go to PubMed...
    8. IAEA. Co-ordinated research programme on nuclear techniques for toxic elements in foodstuffs. IAEA-NAHRES-3. IAEA: Vienna; 1990.
    9. Puklová V, editor. Environmental health monitoring system in the Czech Republic: summary report 2016. Prague: NIPH; 2017.
    10. Krauß P, Deyhle M, Maier KH, Roller E, Weiß HD, Clédon Ph. Field study on the mercury content of saliva. Toxicol Environ Chem. 1997;36(1-4):29-46. Go to original source...
    11. Kennedy DC. Effects of mercury from dental amalgam on human health. In: Mercury as a global pollutant: 5th international conference; 1999 May 23-28; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: Center for Mineral Technology; 1999. p. iv.

    Return to the content