Cent Eur J Public Health 2020, 28(1):65-69 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a5720
Epidemiological study on more accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer
- 1 Urology Department, Havířov Hospital, Havířov, Czech Republic
- 2 Medihope Ltd., Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 3 Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
Objective: The study aimed at assessing the potential benefit of prostate health index (PHI) for early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and the use of PHI as a marker predicting the presence of PCa before performing prostate biopsy.
Methods: The study comprised 55 males who underwent prostate biopsy. Before the procedure, blood samples were collected to test prostate specific antigen (PSA) and free/total PSA ratio (%fPSA) and PHI was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the benefit of these values for predicting the presence of PCa.
Results: Based on histological examination 31 males were diagnosed with PCa, the remaining 24 were negative. Among the PCa patients, 39% had a Gleason score of 6, 26% had a score of 7 and 35% had a score of 8-10. There were statistically significant differences in PHI and PSA between males with and without PCa. The areas under the ROC curve for %fPSA, total PSA and PHI were 0.712, 0.746 and 0.789, respectively. PHI showed the best predictive ability to estimate biopsy results. If the cut-off criterion PHI > 36.4 (77.42% sensitivity, 66.67% specificity) had been used, 41.7% of males would have avoided unnecessary biopsy.
Conclusion: The use of PHI may considerably improve the accuracy of PCa detection in patients with elevated PSA and thus reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.
Keywords: prostate cancer, prostate specific antigen, prostate health index, biopsy
Received: February 20, 2019; Revised: October 17, 2019; Accepted: October 17, 2019; Published: March 30, 2020 Show citation
References
- Epidemiology of malignant tumors in the Czech Republic [Internet]. Masaryk University [cited 2019 Oct 17]. Available from: http://www.svod.cz.
- Král M, Vyhnálková V, Študent V, Bouchal J. Genetic risk of prostate cancer. Ces Urol. 2010;14(3):139-47. (In Czech.)
- International Agency for Research on Cancer. Global Cancer Observatory [Internet]. [cited 2018 Apr 16]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/.
- Vukovic I, Djordjevic D, Bojanic N, Babic U, Soldatovic I. Predictive value of [-2]propsa (p2psa) and its derivatives for the prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0ng/mL PSA range. Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Jan-Feb;43(1):48-56.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Wasserbauer R. Active approach to prostate cancer detection - what is reasonable and what may cause harm. Urol List. 2014;12(2):19-28. (In Czech.)
- Štern P, Vranovský K, Šafarčík K. Prostatic cancer - molecular basis, diagnostics and economy of prevention. Klin Biochem Metab. 2008;16(37):19-26. (In Czech.)
- Huang YQ, Sun T, Zhong WD, Wu CL. Clinical performance of serum [-2]proPSA derivatives, %p2PSA and PHI, in the detection and management of prostate cancer. Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2014 Dec 25;2(4):343-50.
- Beckman Coulter. Prostate Health Index (phi) [Internet]. Beckman Coulter [cited 2018 Apr 24]. Available from: https://www.beckmancoulter.com/products/immunoassay/phi.
- Loeb S, Catalona WJ. The Prostate Health Index: a new test for the detection of prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol. 2014 Apr;6(2):74-7.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Na R, Ye D, Qi J, Liu F, Helfand BT, Brendler CB, et al. Prostate health index significantly reduced unnecessary prostate biopsies in patients with PSA 2-10 ng/mL and PSA >10 ng/mL: results from a Multicenter Study in China. Prostate. 2017 Aug;77(11):1221-9.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Welch HG, Albertsen PC. Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment after the introduction of prostate-specific antigen screening: 1986-2005. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Oct 7;101(19):1325-9.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Nichol MB, Wu J, An JJ, Huang J, Denham D, Frencher S, et al. Budget impact analysis of a new prostate cancer risk index for prostate cancer detection. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2011 Sep;14(3):253-61.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Nichol MB, Wu J, Huang J, Denham D, Frencher SK, Jacobsen SJ. Cost-effectiveness of Prostate Health Index for prostate cancer detection. BJU Int. 2012 Aug;110(3):353-62.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS, Parnes HL, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 27;350(22):2239-46.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Vukotic V, Cerovic S, Kozomara M, Lazic M. The predictive value of PSA in diagnosis of prostate cancer in non screened population. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2005;52(4):81-7.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Tan LG, Tan YK, Tai BC, Tan KM, Gauhar V, Tiong HY, et al. Prospective validation of %p2PSA and the Prostate Health Index, in prostate cancer detection in initial prostate biopsies of Asian men, with total PSA 4-10 ng ml-1. Asian J Androl. 2017 May-Jun;19(3):286-90.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Hsieh PF, Chang CH, Yang CR, Huang CP, Chen WC, Yeh CC, et al. Prostate Health Index (PHI) improves prostate cancer detection at initial biopsy in Taiwanese men with PSA 4-10 ng/mL. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018 Aug;34(8):461-6.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...