Cent Eur J Public Health 2020 Oct;28 Suppl:S12-S16 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a6157

Assessment of local muscular load of dental practitioners

Anna Schlenker1, Martin Kapitán2, Lenka Vavřičková2, Milena Bušová1
1 Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

Objective: Hands and forearms are one of the most common localisations of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among dental practitioners. The aim of this study was to objectively assess the local muscular load of hands and forearms of dental practitioners during various treatment procedures using the method of the integrated electromyography (iEMG). This method is used for health risk assessment and categorization of working operation within the official national methodology.

Methods: A total of 24 measurements were performed on 10 dental practitioners during 8 different dental treatments; mostly on those which are most frequent in clinical practice, i.e. endodontic treatment, tooth extraction, tooth restoration with filling and prosthetic treatment. The EMG Holter was used to detect the electromyographic potentials determining the local muscular load.

Results: All the muscle groups of the forearm were relatively evenly loaded at work. During the dynamic work activity, the average time-weighted value of maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC) was in the range from 1 to 30 %MVC for all evaluated muscle groups. The mean average time-weighted value of %MVC did not exceed 6% (a critical limit of the mean average time-weighted value of %MVC) in any of the evaluated muscle groups. The results of the frequency analysis showed that large (55-70 %MVC) and rarely the limits exceeding values (above 70 %MVC) were observed for individual muscle groups. These forces are related to performing tasks at inaccessible locations associated with non-physiological working positions. The differences in the mean forearm muscle load between the upper limbs were statistically significant in total (p < 0.001), for flexors (p = 0.017) and for extensors (p = 0.006).

Conclusion: In view of the results of this study, the work of dentists can be ranked in category 2 in terms of the local muscle load factor according to the currently valid legislation in the Czech Republic.

Keywords: integrated electromyography, local muscular load, evaluation, dental treatment, prevention of repetitive strain injury

Received: February 28, 2020; Revised: August 8, 2020; Accepted: August 8, 2020; Published: October 18, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Schlenker A, Kapitán M, Vavřičková L, Bušová M. Assessment of local muscular load of dental practitioners. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2020;28(Supplement):S12-16. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a6157. PubMed PMID: 33069175.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abbas SB, Qazi SR, Iftikhar S, Iqbal MU. Musculoskeletal disorders among dentists and dental students. Pak Oral Dental J. 2015;35(3):461-5.
    2. Hayes MJ, Cockrell D, Smith DR. A systematic review of musculoskeletal disorders among dental professionals. Int J Dent Hyg. 2009;7(3):159-65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Hodacova L, Sustova Z, Cermakova E, Kapitan M, Smejkalova J. Self-reported risk factors related to the most frequent musculoskeletal complaints among Czech dentists. Ind Health. 2015;53(1):48-55. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Leggat PA, Kedjarune U, Smith DR. Occupational health problems in modern dentistry: a review. Ind Health. 2007;45(5):611-21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Šustová Z, Hodačová L, Kapitán M. The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among dentists in the Czech Republic. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2013;56(4):150-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Lindfors P, von Thiele U, Lundberg U. Work characteristics and upper extremity disorders in female dental health workers. J Occup Health. 2006;48(3):192-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Szymańska J. Disorders of the musculoskeletal system among dentists from the aspect of ergonomics and prophylaxis. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2002;9(2):169-73.
    8. EMG Holter [Internet]. Prague: GETA Centrum s.r.o.; 2018 [cited 2020 Feb 14]. Available from: http://fyziologie.getacentrum.cz/emg-holter/. (In Czech.)
    9. Hlávková J. Assessment of local muscle load [Internet]. Hradec Králové: Krajská hygienická stanice Královéhradeckého kraje se sídlem v Hradci Králové; 2016 [cited 2020 Feb 14]. Available from: http://www.khshk.cz/e-learning/kurs5/. (In Czech.)
    10. Ohlendorf D, Erbe C, Hauck I, Nowak J, Hermanns I, Ditchen D, et al. Kinematic analysis of work-related musculoskeletal loading of trunk among dentists in Germany. BMC Musculoskel Dis. 2016;17(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1288-0. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Schlenker A, Tichý T. A New approach to the evaluation of local muscular load while typing on a keyboard. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2017;25(4):255-60. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    Return to the content