Cent Eur J Public Health 2021, 29(2):134-142 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a6350

Effectiveness of anti-smoking interventions towards community: a meta-analysis study

Egemen Ünal1, Selma Metintaş2
1 Department of Public Health, Medical Faculty, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
2 Department of Public Health, Medical Faculty, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey

Objectives: Smoking is one of the biggest public health problems in the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared the MPOWER package which provides a guide for tobacco control. The package includes six evidence based anti-smoking interventions. This meta-analysis study aims to assess the effectiveness of MPOWER - (M)onitor, (P)rotect, (O)ffer, (W)arn, (E)nforce, and (R)aise. In the study, "smoking prevalence rate, smoking cessation rate and number of cigarettes smoked daily" outputs were used in adult and adolescent age groups.

Methods: Literature search has been made with "smok*, tobacco, cigarette*" keywords from the databases of Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane-Library. Abstracts were assessed in detail according to the inclusion criteria by the research team. Quality of articles was evaluated with modified Jadad criteria. The follow-up periods of articles were determined in two groups named as short and long term periods. We used random effects model (p ≤ 0.05) and fixed effects model (p > 0.05) according to the heterogeneity test results.

Results: P and O interventions, which are evaluated with smoking cessation rate, increased the smoking cessation rate in adults by 39% in the longest follow-up period - RR: 1.39 (1.23-1.57). However, it was determined that the interventions were not effective on smoking cessation rate in adolescents - RR: 1.13 (0.90-1.42). Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) was the most effective intervention for smoking cessation rate in adults. W interventions, which are evaluated with smoking prevalence rate, decreased the smoking prevalence rate in adults by 13% in the longest follow-up period - OR: 0.87 (0.82-0.92). P, W and E interventions, which are evaluated with smoking prevalence rate, decreased the smoking prevalence rate in adolescents by 26% in the longest follow-up period - OR: 0.74 (0.68-0.80).

Conclusions: MPOWER interventions affect smoking prevalence rate, smoking cessation rate and number of cigarettes smoked daily in different age groups. Well-controlled, well-planned and cost-effective anti-smoking interventions have great importance for public health protection.

Klíčová slova: meta-analysis, anti-smoking intervention, effectiveness

Vloženo: 16. červen 2020; Revidováno: 29. leden 2021; Přijato: 29. leden 2021; Zveřejněno: 30. červen 2021  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ünal E, Metintaş S. Effectiveness of anti-smoking interventions towards community: a meta-analysis study. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2021;29(2):134-142. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a6350. PubMed PMID: 34245554.
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. World Health Organization. Tobacco fact sheet [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2015 [cited 2020 May 27]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs339/en/.
    2. Tobacco Control Studies in Turkey in 2012 [Internet]. Ankara: T.R. Ministry of Health; 2012 [cited 2017 Jan 29]. Available from: http://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR/belge/1-15787/turkiyede-tutun-kontrolu-calismalari.html. (In Turkish.)
    3. Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006;3(11):e442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    4. World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
    5. T.R. Ministry of Health, Public Health Agency of Turkey. Global adult tobacco survey Turkey report 2012 [Internet]. Ankara: T.R. Ministry of Health; 2014 [cited 2017 Jan 26]. Available from: http://www.halksagligiens.hacettepe.edu.tr/KYTA_TR.pdf. (In Turkish.)
    6. World Health Organization. The Tobacco atlas. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
    7. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2008: the MPOWER package. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
    8. World Health Organization. MPOWER : a policy package to reverse the tobacco epidemic. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
    9. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2013: enforcing bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
    10. Kahende JW, Loomis BR, Adhikari B, Marshall L. A review of economic evaluations of tobacco control programs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6(1):51-68. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    11. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    12. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1-12. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    13. Valdivieso López E, Rey-Reñones C, Rodriguez-Blanco T, Ferre Grau C, Arija V, Barrera Uriarte ML, et al. Efficacy of a smoking prevention programme in Catalan secondary schools: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Spain. Addiction. 2015 May;110(5):852-60. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    14. Hamilton G, Cross D, Resnicow K, Hall M. A school-based harm minimization smoking intervention trial: outcome results. Addiction. 2005;100(5):689-700. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    15. Isensee B, Hansen J, Maruska K, Hanewinkel R. Effects of a school-based prevention programme on smoking in early adolescence: a 6-month follow-up of the 'Eigenstandig werden' cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 21;4(1):e004422. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004422. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    16. Gorini G, Carreras G, Bosi S, Tamelli M, Monti C, Storani S, et al. Effectiveness of a school-based multi-component smoking prevention intervention: The LdP cluster randomized controlled trial. Prevent Med. 2014;61:6-13. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    17. Eisenberg MJ, Filion KB, Yavin D, Belisle P, Mottillo S, Joseph L, et al. Pharmacotherapies for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ. 2008;179(2):135-44. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    18. Wu P, Wilson K, Dimoulas P, Mills EJ. Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2006 Dec 11;6:300. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-300. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    19. Hersi M, Traversy G, Thombs BD, Beck A, Skidmore B, Groulx S, et al. Effectiveness of stop smoking interventions among adults:protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and an updated systematic review. Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 19;8(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0928-x. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    20. Carson KV, Ameer F, Sayehmiri K, Hnin K, van Agteren JE, Sayehmiri F, et al. Mass media interventions for preventing smoking in young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 2;6(6):CD001006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001006.pub3. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    21. McNeill A, Gravely S, Hitchman SC, Bauld L, Hammond D, Hartmann-Boyce J. Tobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco use. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 27;4(4):CD011244. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011244.pub2. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    22. Hartmann-Boyce J, Chepkin SC, Ye W, Bullen C, Lancaster T. Nicotine replacement therapy versus control for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 31;5(5):CD000146. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000146.pub5. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    23. Lindson N, Klemperer E, Hong B, Ordóñez-Mena JM, Aveyard P. Smoking reduction interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 30;9(9):CD013183. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013183.pub2. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    24. Faber T, Kumar A, Mackenbach JP, Millett C, Basu S, Sheikh A, et al. Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(9), e420-37. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30144-5. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    25. Cahill K, Lancaster T. Workplace interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 26;(2):CD003440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003440.pub4. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    26. Matkin W, Ordóñez-Mena JM, Hartmann-Boyce J. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 2;5(5):CD002850. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002850.pub4. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    27. Harvey J, Chadi N. Strategies to promote smoking cessation among adolescents. Paediatr Child Health. 2016 May;21(4):201-8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    28. Méndez D, Alshanqeety O, Warner KE. The potential impact of smoking control policies on future global smoking trends. Tob Control. 2013;22(1):46-51. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    29. Goyal A. Tobacco epidemics: effect of marketing bans and awareness programs on its spread. Appl Math Comp. 2014;247:1030-51. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    30. Unal E, Gokler ME, Metintas S, Kalyoncu C. Effect of anti-smoking advertisements on Turkish adolescents. East Mediterr Health J. 2016;22(9):654-61. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    31. Saffer H. Tobacco advertising and promotion. In: Jha P, Chaloupka FJ, editors. Tobacco control policies in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 215-36. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    32. Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE. The Economics of smoking. Working paper, no. 7047. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research; 1999. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    33. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control an Prevention. Reducing tobacco use: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: CDC; 2000.
    34. Jawad M, Lee JT, Glantz S, Millett C. Price elasticity of demand of non-cigarette tobacco products: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tob Control. 2018 Nov;27(6):689-95. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...

    Zpět na obsah