Cent Eur J Public Health 2023, 31(3):155-165 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a7884

Quality of rainwater and reclaimed water used in buildings and selection of appropriate indicators

Šárka Bobková, Dana Baudišová, František Kožíšek, Hana Jeligová, Petr Pumann
Department of Water Hygiene, Centre for Health and the Environment, National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic

Objectives: The use of alternative water sources such as rainwater or greywater (i.e., wastewater excluding water from toilets) for non-potable purposes may save water but, on the other hand, can also pose health risks to users. The main health risks come from microorganisms (such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa). This work aims to analyse especially microbiological quality of rainwater and greywater used inside buildings in detail and to expand the existing knowledge about the potential health risks associated with these alternative water sources. It also considers methodological problems during E. coli and coliform bacteria detection. The final objective is to discuss requirements and appropriate indicators for monitoring recycled water quality.

Methods: We examined 30 buildings with non-potable water systems in the Czech Republic and analysed a total of 137 samples of rainwater and 120 samples of greywater. From these 30 buildings, eleven, 5 of which used rainwater and 6 of which used greywater, were sampled regularly for 1-2 years for basic chemical parameters, various faecal indicators, C. perfringens, Legionella spp. and P. aeruginosa. Occasionally, samples were analysed also for the presence of environmental mycobacteria, amoebas, viruses, and selected pathogens.

Results: Nearly three quarters of rainwater samples contained the faecal indicators E. coli or enterococci, or both, and in samples from several buildings also Clostridium perfringens was repeatedly detected. Untreated and treated rainwater were in respect to microbiological quality similar, suggesting that treatment processes were not very efficient. In greywater samples, beside faecal indicators, also P. aeruginosa and thermotolerant amoebas were repeatedly detected. Treatment technologies used for greywater were more efficient than those for rainwater systems.

Conclusion: Based on the results we evaluated appropriate indicators for monitoring recycled water quality and drafted the first Czech regulation for non-potable water.

Keywords: non-potable water, rainwater, reclaimed water, health risk, microbiological quality, hygienic requirements

Received: May 23, 2023; Revised: August 17, 2023; Accepted: August 17, 2023; Published: September 30, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bobková Š, Baudišová D, Kožíšek F, Jeligová H, Pumann P. Quality of rainwater and reclaimed water used in buildings and selection of appropriate indicators. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2023;31(3):155-165. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a7884. PubMed PMID: 37934478.
Download citation

Attachments

Download fileSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: Table S1.

a7884_supplementary_material.pdf
File size: 1.17 MB

References

  1. Ahmed W, Gardner T, Toze S. Microbiological quality of roof-harvested rainwater and health risks: a review. J Environ Qual. 2011 Jan-Feb; 40(1):13-21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Hamilton K, Reyneke B, Waso M, Clements T, Ndlovu T, Khan W, et al. A global review of the microbiological quality and potential health risks associated with roof-harvested rainwater tanks. Npj Clean Water. 2019;2:7. doi: 10.1038/s41545-019-0030-5. Go to original source...
  3. Chubaka CE, Whiley H, Edwards JW, Ross KE. A review of roof harvested rainwater in Australia. J Environ Public Health. 2018 Jan 21;2018:6471324. doi: 10.1155/2018/6471324. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. World Health Organization. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. 4th ed incorporating the first and second addenda. Geneva: WHO; 2022.
  5. Oron G, Adel M, Agmon V, Friedler E, Halperin R, Leshem E, et al. Greywater use in Israel and worldwide: standards and prospects. Water Res. 2014 Jul 1;58:92-101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. ISO 20426. Guideline for health risk assessment and management for non-potable water reuse. Geneva: ISO; 2018.
  7. Noman EA, Radin Mohamed RMS, Al-Gheethi AA, Al-Shaibani MM, Al-Wrafy FA, Al-Maqtari QA, et al. Antibiotics and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in greywater: challenges of the current treatment situation and predictions of future scenario. Environ Res. 2022 Sep;212(Pt C):113380. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113380. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. CSN 75 7835. [Water quality - Detection and enumeration of thermotolerant coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli]. Prague: Czech Standardization Agency; 2009. Czech.
  9. CSN 75 7840. [Water quality - Determination of atypical mycobacteria in water]. Prague: Czech Standardization Agency; 2022. Czech.
  10. Fewtrell L, Bartram J, editors. Water quality: guidelines, standards and health: assessment of risk and risk management for water-related infectious diseases. London: IWA Publishing; 2001.
  11. Zhang Q, Wang X, Hou P, Wan W, Li R, Ren Y, et al. Quality and seasonal variation of rainwater harvested from concrete, asphalt, ceramic tile and green roofs in Chongqing, China. J Environ Manage. 2014 Jan;132:178-87. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Ashbolt NJ. Environmental (saprozoic) pathogens of engineered water systems: understanding their ecology for risk assessment and management. Pathogens. 2015 Jun 19;4(2):390-405. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Nagarkar M, Keely SP, Brinkman NE, Garland JL. Human- and infrastructure-associated bacteria in greywater. J Appl Microbiol. 2021 Nov;131(5):2178-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Chidamba L, Korsten L. Relative proportions of E. coli and Enterococcus spp. may be a good indicator of potential health risks associated with the use of roof harvested rainwater stored in tanks. Environ Monit Assess. 2018;190(3):177. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6554-1. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. da Hora J, Cohim EB, SipertS, Leao A. Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) of campylobacter for roof-harvested rainwater domestic use. Proceedings. 2018;2(5):185. doi: 10.3390/ecws-2-04954. Go to original source...
  16. Oteng-Peprah M, Acheampong MA, deVries NK. Greywater characteristics, treatment systems, reuse strategies and user perception-a review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2018;229(8):255. doi: 10.1007/s11270-018-3909-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Radwan S, Ashour E. Microbial quality assessment of greywater sources to reuse for different purposes. Environ Eng Manag J. 2020 Jun;19(6): 969-76. Go to original source...
  18. Shi KW, Wang CW, Jiang SC. Quantitative microbial risk assessment of greywater on-site reuse. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Sep 1;635:1507-19. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Moritz MM, Flemming HC, Wingender J. Integration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Legionella pneumophila in drinking water biofilms grown on domestic plumbing materials. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2010 Jun;213(3):190-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Sharvelle S, Ashbolt N, Clerico E, Hultquist R, Leverenz H, Olivieri A; National Water Research Institute. Risk-based framework for the development of public health guidance for decentralized non-potable water systems. Alexandria: Water Environment & Reuse Foundation; 2017. Go to original source...
  21. Commission notice: Guidelines to support the application of Regulation 2020/741 on minimum requirements for water reuse 2022/C 298/01. Off J Eur Union. 2022 Aug 5;65(C 298):1-55.
  22. Regulation (EU) 2020/741 of the European Parliament and the Council of 25 May 2020 on minimum requirements for water reuse. Off J Eur Union. 2020 Jun 5;63(L 177):32-55.