Cent Eur J Public Health 2025, 33(3):163-169 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a8520

Feasibility and acceptability of telemedicine in prenatal care for low-risk pregnancies: a comparative study of remote and in-person approaches in the Czech Republic

Adéla Tefr Faridová1, 2, Eva Miletínová3, 4, Ondřej Tefr5, Jitka Bušková3, 4, Beáta Čečetková6, Jiří Pecina5, Ladislav Krofta1, 4, Hynek Heřman1, 4
1 Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Department of Pathophysiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
3 National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic
4 Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
5 MEDDIHub a.s., Prague, Czech Republic
6 Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Košice, Slovak Republic

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of remote prenatal care using a smartphone application for women with low-risk pregnancies, and to compare outcomes with standard in-person care.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at the Institute for Maternal and Child Care in Podolí, Prague. A total of 225 pregnant women were enrolled: 119 received combined telemedicine and standard in-person follow-ups (W-DF group), while 106 received only standard in-person care (W-PF group). Data on patient satisfaction across various domains of care were collected and analysed.

Results: Women in the W-DF group reported significantly higher satisfaction with information adequacy, confidentiality, and understanding of test results (p < 0.001). Conversely, the W-PF group showed greater satisfaction in childbirth preparedness, access to community programmes, and lifestyle guidance (p < 0.05). Overall satisfaction scores were comparable between the two groups (W-DF mean = 263.0, W-PF mean = 275.1; p = 0.263).

Conclusions: Telemedicine in prenatal care offers advantages such as reduced time and logistical burdens and improved personalization of care. However, psychosocial and lifestyle support remains stronger in traditional models. A hybrid model that integrates telemedicine with periodic in-person visits may provide more comprehensive support. Further large-scale studies are needed to optimize implementation.

Klíčová slova: prenatal care, telemedicine, pregnancy

Vloženo: 16. leden 2025; Revidováno: 18. srpen 2025; Přijato: 18. srpen 2025; Zveřejněno: 30. září 2025  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Tefr Faridová A, Miletínová E, Tefr O, Bušková J, Čečetková B, Pecina J, et al.. Feasibility and acceptability of telemedicine in prenatal care for low-risk pregnancies: a comparative study of remote and in-person approaches in the Czech Republic. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2025;33(3):163-169. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a8520.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Heřman H, Faridová A, Tefr O, Farid S, Ayayee N, Trojanová K, et al. Telemedicine in prenatal care. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2022 Jun;30(2):131-5. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  2. Crico C, Renzi C, Graf N, Buyx A, Kondylakis H, Koumakis L, et al. mHealth and telemedicine apps: in search of a common regulation. Ecancermedicalscience. 2018 Jul 11;12:853. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.853. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  3. Raposo VL. Telemedicine: the legal framework (or the lack of it) in Europe. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2016;12:Doc03. doi: 10.3205/hta000126. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  4. Butler Tobah YS, LeBlanc A, Branda ME, Inselman JW, Morris MA, Ridgeway JL, et al. Randomized comparison of a reduced-visit prenatal care model enhanced with remote monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):638.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.034. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  5. Greiner AL. Telemedicine applications in obstetrics and gynecology. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60(4):853-66. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. Lee S, Hitt WC. Clinical applications of telemedicine in gynecology and women's health. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2020 Jun;47(2):259-70. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  7. Murugesu S, Galazis N, Jones BP, Chan M, Bracewell-Milnes T, Ahmed-Salim Y, et al. Evaluating the use of telemedicine in gynaecological practice: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):e039457. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039457. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  8. Glaser J, Nouri S, Fernandez A, Sudore RL, Schillinger D, Klein-Fedyshin M, et al. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: an updated systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):119-43. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  9. Schenker Y, Fernandez A, Sudore R, Schillinger D. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1):151-73. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  10. Murdoch B. Privacy and artificial intelligence: challenges for protecting health information in a new era. BMC Med Ethics. 2021;22(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00687-3. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  11. Qiu H, Qiu M, Liu M, Memmi G. Secure health data sharing for medical cyber-physical systems for the healthcare 4.0. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Sep;24(9):2499-505. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  12. Wilkowska W, Ziefle M. Privacy and data security in e-health: requirements from the user's perspective. Health Informatics J. 2012 Sep;18(3):191-201. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  13. Gagliardi AR, Yip CYY, Irish J, Wright FC, Rubin B, Ross H, et al The psychological burden of waiting for procedures and patient-centred strategies that could support the mental health of wait-listed patients and caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):978-90. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  14. Veleminsky M Jr, Průchová D, Vránová V, Boledovičová M, Samková J, Samek J, et al. Medical and salutogenic approaches and their integration in taking prenatal and postnatal care of Czech women. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2014;35 Suppl 1:80-9.
  15. Miteniece E, Pavlova M, Rechel B, Groot W. Barriers to accessing adequate maternal care in Central and Eastern European countries: a systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;177:1-8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  16. O'Hara MW, Swain AM. Rates and risk of postpartum depression - a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry. 1996;8(1):37-54. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  17. Zinga D, Phillips SD, Born L, Marin MF, Katzman MA, Steiner M. Postpartum mood disorders: an evidence-based approach to screening and treatment. CNS Drugs. 2005;19(7):567-84.
  18. Kreuter F, Presser S, Tourangeau R, Couper MP, Conrad FG, Groves RM. Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and web surveys: the effects of mode and question sensitivity. Public Opin Q. 2008;72(5):847-65. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  19. van Gelder MM, Bretveld RW, Roeleveld N. Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology? Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec 1;172(11):1292-8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  20. Lee S, Groß SE, Pfaff H, Dresen A. Waiting time, communication quality, and patient satisfaction: an analysis of moderating influences on the relationship between perceived waiting time and the satisfaction of breast cancer patients during their inpatient stay. Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Apr;103(4):819-25. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...