Cent Eur J Public Health 2019, 27(Supplement):S83-S91 | DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a5980

National Addiction-specific Institutional Infrastructure – fundamental prerequisite for successful implementation of specialized academic degree study programmes: a case study in historical perspective

Michal Miovský1, Anna Vondrová1, Roger Peters2, Beatrice Kathungu3, Amalie Lososová1
1 Department of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 UTC/UPC Coordinating Centre, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
3 Department of Psychology, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

Objective: Human resources are crucial for addiction treatment and prevention services, as well as for science and research. The aim of this historical case study is to explain and demonstrate the role of specialized university academic degree study programmes in addictions in the context of a national institutional infrastructure. This specific group of very highly specialized academic programmes represents the highest level of professional development and is producing a totally new generation of addiction specialists with a very distinctive professional identity.

Methods: The study protocol is based on a case study research design and the case is defined as the historical development of addiction specialized institutions closely related to self-help, prevention, and treatment activities on the historical territory of the Czech Republic. We identified relevant historical sources related to establishing and/or running activities or institutions according to the categories specified in our concept of the national institutional infrastructure. All the materials and sources that were collected were sorted according to a timeline and categories of institutions and we systematically determined the first recorded activity/institution in each particular category. For this simple sorting system we used open and selected coding according to Grounded Theory.

Results: The public health model developed by Thomas Babor recognizes six different structural mechanisms to support university-based programmes in addiction studies: specialized journals, research centres, professional societies, specialized libraries and documentation centres, training and education programmes and institutions, and funding agencies. We attempted to redefine the concept of addiction studies within the broader context of the addiction field and added three additional mechanisms of support: public interest groups, self-help groups, and service providers. Using a historical case study in the Czech Republic, we demonstrate the potential for a broader context and interaction between these support mechanisms and academic institutions hosting academic programmes in addiction studies.

Conclusion: The process of establishing integrated addiction studies programmes at Charles University in the Czech Republic had its origins in, and support from, various national institutions and professional organizations. This allowed the university to develop academic programmes at the bachelor's, master's, and Ph.D. levels. The availability of career opportunities for advanced-level addiction professionals in the Czech Republic was also a critically important factor in developing sustainable academic programmes in addiction studies. Our experience is that the creation of successful and sustainable academic programmes for addiction professionals is difficult to achieve without broad infrastructure support, national advocacy efforts, and legislative change at the national level.

Klíčová slova: academic degree study programmes, specialized addiction programmes, public health, institutional infrastructure, implementation process

Vloženo: 1. říjen 2019; Revidováno: 6. prosinec 2019; Přijato: 6. prosinec 2019; Zveřejněno: 31. prosinec 2019  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Miovský M, Vondrová A, Peters R, Kathungu B, Lososová A. National Addiction-specific Institutional Infrastructure – fundamental prerequisite for successful implementation of specialized academic degree study programmes: a case study in historical perspective. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2019;27(Supplement):S83-91. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a5980. PubMed PMID: 31901196.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Babor TF, Morisano D, Noel J, Robaina K, Ward JH, Mitchell AL. Infrastructure and career opportunities in addiction science: the emergence of an interdisciplinary field. In: Babor TF, Stenius K, Pates R, Miovský M, O'Reilly J, Candon P, editors. Publishing addiction science: a guide for the perplexed. London: Ubiquity Press; 2017. p. 9-34. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  2. Edwards G, editor. Addiction: evolution of a specialist field. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2002. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  3. Miovský M, Miller P, Grund JP, Belackova V, Gabrhelik R, Libra J. Academic education in addictology (addiction science) in the Czech Republic: analysis of the (pre-1989) historical origins. Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2015;32(5):527-38. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  4. Thom B, Duke K, Herring R. Workforce development: Is there a paradigm shift? Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2017;24(6):427-9. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  5. Pavlovská A, Miovský M, Babor TF, Gabrhelík R. Overview of the European university-based study programmes in the addictions field. Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2017;24(6):485-91. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. Pavlovská A, Peters RH, Gabrhelík R, Miovský M, Sloboda Z, Babor TF. Overview of the university-based addiction studies programmes in the United States. J Subst Use. 2019;24(1):55-60. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  7. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 1989.
  8. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. London: Aldine; 1967. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  9. Strauss AL, Corbin JM, editors. Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 1997.
  10. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 1994.
  11. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 1998.
  12. Miovsky M, Gabrhelík R, Libra J, Popov P, Pavlovska A, Kalina K, et al. The Prague comprehensive model of academic addictology (addiction science) education. Adiktologie. 2016;16(1):36-49.
  13. Písecký F. Teetotalism at secondary schools. Ostřízlivění. 1912-13. (In Czech)
  14. Foerster V. Youth, spirits, character. Ostřízlivění. 1912-13. (In Czech)
  15. Mikotová M. Fifty years of the alcohol counselling service in Brno. Protialkoholický obzor. 1981;16(6):365-9. (In Czech.)
  16. Gabrhelík R, Miovský M. History of self-help and 'quasi-self-help' groups in the Czech Republic: development and current situation in the institutional context of drug services. Adiktologie. 2011;11(2):101-12.
  17. Miovský M, Popov P, Šejvl J. The "U Apolináře" Department of Addictology from the perspective of the 70 years of its development. Prague: The Department of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague; 2018. (In Czech.)
  18. Larkin T. Users Forum as an advisory board for the government. UISCE as an organization, its significance for users and society. In: 9th National Conference of the Society of Addictive Diseases and 42nd Conference of the Jan Evangelista Purkyne Czech Medical Association; 2003 May 19-23; Měřín, Czech Republic. Tišnov: Sdružení SCAN; 2003.
  19. Šejvl J, Miovský M. The First specialised residential treatment institution and programme for alcohol-related problems in the historical area of Bohemia and Moravia: case study of the first residential alcohol programme in Velké Kunčice (1911-1915). Adiktologie. 2017;17(2):134-46. (In Czech.)
  20. Šejvl J, Miovský M. The First facility for the institutional treatment of alcohol dependence in the Czechoslovak Republic: case study of the Tuchlov treatment facility (1923-1938). Adiktol Prevent Leceb Praxi. 2018;1(2):68-78. (In Czech.)
  21. Skála J. Alcoholism - terminology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Prague: SZN; 1957. (In Czech.)
  22. Mečíř J. The Abuse of alcohol and non-alcohol drugs among young people. Prague: Avicentrum; 1989. (In Czech.)
  23. Radimecký J. Lifelong education in addictology. Adiktologie. 2007;7(2):46-57. (In Czech.)
  24. Polydorou S, Gunderson EW, Levin FR. Training physicians to treat substance use disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2008;10(5):399-404. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  25. Janíková B. Harm reduction: early interventions in low-threshold services. In: Kalina K, et al. Basics of clinical addictology. Prague: Grada Publishing; 2008. p. 99-109. (In Czech.)
  26. Miovsky M, Kalina K, Libra J. Education in addictology in the Czech Republic: the scope and role of the proposed system. Adiktologie. 2014;14(3):310-28. (In Czech.)
  27. Miovský M, editor. The System of specialised addiction treatment services: a policy document. Prague: The Department of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague; 2014. (In Czech.)
  28. Skála J. A History of the Centre for Alcoholism and Other Toxicomanias (1956-1981). Protialkoholický obzor. 1984;19(4):247-9. (In Czech.)
  29. Czech Association of Addictology. Articles of Association [Internet]. Prague: Czech Association of Addictology; 2016 [cited 2017 Jul 20]. Available from: http://www.asociace-adiktologu.cz/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/1_stanovy_CAA_final.doc.pdf.
  30. Sklenář O: 919 - Health interventions of an addictologist. Adiktologie. 2013;13(1):4-5. (In Czech.)
  31. Vondrová A, Oktábec Z, Janouškovec V, Sklenář O. One stop on the way to becoming a clinical addictologist. Adiktol Prevent Leceb Praxi. 2018;1(1):39-41. (In Czech.)
  32. Czech Association of Addictology Students. Articles of Association [Internet]. Prague: Czech Association of Addictology Students; 2015 [cited 2019 Nov 30]. Available from: http://www.addictology.net/o-nas/stanovy/. (In Czech.)
  33. Skála J. Ethical issues of alcohol and drug services. Zdravotnická výchova. 1985;21(2):151-6. (In Czech.)
  34. Miovský M. The Health discipline of addictology: reflections on the origin, recent developments, and future orientation of the specialized academic programme. Adiktologie. 2007;7(2):30-45. (In Czech.)
  35. Greer PM, Kuehn D. National education standards vital for addiction professionals. Alcohol Drug Abuse Wkly. 2009;21(18):5.
  36. Pasche S, Kleintjes S, Wilson D, Stein DJ, Myers B. Improving addiction care in South Africa: Development and challenges to implementing training in addictions care at the University of Cape Town. Int J Ment Health Addiction. 2014;13(3):322-32. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  37. Winkler P, Csemy L. Self-experimentations with psychedelics among mental health professionals: LSD in the former Czechoslovakia. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014;46(1):11-9. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  38. Miovský M, Gabrhelík R, Libra J. The draft strategy for addiction science and research in the Czech Republic. Adiktologie. 2014;14(3):294-308.
  39. Butler S. Addiction counsellors in the Republic of Ireland: exploring the emergence of a new profession. Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2011;18(4):295-302. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  40. Butler S. Addiction studies at Trinity College Dublin. Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2011;18(4):241-2. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  41. Adamson S, Deering D, Schroder R, Townshend P, Ditchburn M. National telephone survey of the addiction treatment workforce. Christchurch: National Addiction Centre, University of Otago; 2009.
  42. Adams PJ, Sellman D, Newcombe D, Adamson S, White S, Deering D, et al. Postgraduate alcohol and other drug practitioner training in New Zealand: significant influences. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017;78(3):468-74. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  43. Miovský M. Addictology in the international context. Adiktologie. 2016;16(3):196-203. (In Czech.)